Well, Bolivia Was Supposed to Have Elections December 4th…
As I have written before, never be surprised by the surprises that can arise out of Bolivian politics. Now we have yet another. The national elections scheduled for December 4th may well be postponed until, well, who knows when. Here's the story.
Last June a series of nationwide social protests over two issues – corporate ownership of the nation's gas and the call for a citizen assembly to rewrite the constitution – culminated in the resignation of President Carlos Mesa. He resigned more because he seemed to want out than because of any broad demand that he do so.
Mesa's resignation and the assumption of the Presidency by the Supreme Court head, Eduardo Rodriguez, triggered new Presidential elections that were scheduled for December 4th. In a move that was always constitutionally debatable, the government ceded to social movement demands that the new elections also toss out and replace the sitting Congress as well, a move resisted by Congress members not too keen to give up their sought-after jobs two years early.
In any event, by late August the Bolivian campaign season was in full swing with candidates selected for seats all the way down the slate, from President to Congress, and the slogans and promises started flying in from all sides.
Then the congressional delegation from Santa Cruz through a big whopping monkey wrench into the whole process. The December elections were to be based on the population figures from Bolivia's 1991 national census not the much more current 2001 count of where Bolivians reside.
Translated into regular words, this means that Santa Cruz, Cochabamba and other areas of big population growth are headed into elections in which they aren’t getting their fair share of congressional seats (and in turn, their fair share in the congressional vote that will elect the new president in January). The Santa Cruz delegation filed a legal demand to stop the elections and correct the numbers and on September 22 Bolivia's Constitutional Tribunal, which rules on such matters, agreed and ordered that the elections not go forward as planned.
Well, one thing that you can be sure of is that when a major constitutional issue is at stake, in Bolivia or any country, the political actors involved will make a quick assessment of their political self-interest and launch a battle to defend it. Bolivia's political leaders have proven no exception to that rule.
Congress members from La Paz, Oruro and Potosi, all areas which stand to lose seats if the 2001 census data is used, have launched a defense that is essentially, "okay, if we are going to play strictly by the law let's play strictly by the law," and have called on the Congressional elections to be cancelled altogether until the normal 2007 schedule. Members of Congress who resigned their seats to run for higher office are now trying to see if they can take back their resignations. MAS Presidential candidate, Evo Morales, traveling in France this week issued a statement demanding that the elections go on as scheduled and warning, "It is not the social groups, it is not the indigenous movement that are challenging the country or destabilizing it. It is the state institutions, the Constitutional Court and behind them are the transnationals, the U.S. embassy, which wants to avert any triumph of the indigenous movement."
Meanwhile President Rodriguez and the Congress are wrapped in some sort of political dance trying to find a solution that can keep the December 4 election date in tact and Rodriguez is probably really wishing someone else held his unenviable job.
Personally, I don't see any real conspiracy here. I think that since the Mesa resignation in June Bolivia has been wandering in the risky land of dubious constitutionality. Most people sort of turned a bind eye to that and hoped that a brief bridge of dubious constitutionality would take Bolivia forward to a new start.
The new start never looked all that promising (see my recent analysis of possible election outcomes) and now it appears that the competing regional interests have called the question on Bolivian constitutionality.
What will happen next? As the saying goes: Those who know don't say and those who say don't know.
Last June a series of nationwide social protests over two issues – corporate ownership of the nation's gas and the call for a citizen assembly to rewrite the constitution – culminated in the resignation of President Carlos Mesa. He resigned more because he seemed to want out than because of any broad demand that he do so.
Mesa's resignation and the assumption of the Presidency by the Supreme Court head, Eduardo Rodriguez, triggered new Presidential elections that were scheduled for December 4th. In a move that was always constitutionally debatable, the government ceded to social movement demands that the new elections also toss out and replace the sitting Congress as well, a move resisted by Congress members not too keen to give up their sought-after jobs two years early.
In any event, by late August the Bolivian campaign season was in full swing with candidates selected for seats all the way down the slate, from President to Congress, and the slogans and promises started flying in from all sides.
Then the congressional delegation from Santa Cruz through a big whopping monkey wrench into the whole process. The December elections were to be based on the population figures from Bolivia's 1991 national census not the much more current 2001 count of where Bolivians reside.
Translated into regular words, this means that Santa Cruz, Cochabamba and other areas of big population growth are headed into elections in which they aren’t getting their fair share of congressional seats (and in turn, their fair share in the congressional vote that will elect the new president in January). The Santa Cruz delegation filed a legal demand to stop the elections and correct the numbers and on September 22 Bolivia's Constitutional Tribunal, which rules on such matters, agreed and ordered that the elections not go forward as planned.
Well, one thing that you can be sure of is that when a major constitutional issue is at stake, in Bolivia or any country, the political actors involved will make a quick assessment of their political self-interest and launch a battle to defend it. Bolivia's political leaders have proven no exception to that rule.
Congress members from La Paz, Oruro and Potosi, all areas which stand to lose seats if the 2001 census data is used, have launched a defense that is essentially, "okay, if we are going to play strictly by the law let's play strictly by the law," and have called on the Congressional elections to be cancelled altogether until the normal 2007 schedule. Members of Congress who resigned their seats to run for higher office are now trying to see if they can take back their resignations. MAS Presidential candidate, Evo Morales, traveling in France this week issued a statement demanding that the elections go on as scheduled and warning, "It is not the social groups, it is not the indigenous movement that are challenging the country or destabilizing it. It is the state institutions, the Constitutional Court and behind them are the transnationals, the U.S. embassy, which wants to avert any triumph of the indigenous movement."
Meanwhile President Rodriguez and the Congress are wrapped in some sort of political dance trying to find a solution that can keep the December 4 election date in tact and Rodriguez is probably really wishing someone else held his unenviable job.
Personally, I don't see any real conspiracy here. I think that since the Mesa resignation in June Bolivia has been wandering in the risky land of dubious constitutionality. Most people sort of turned a bind eye to that and hoped that a brief bridge of dubious constitutionality would take Bolivia forward to a new start.
The new start never looked all that promising (see my recent analysis of possible election outcomes) and now it appears that the competing regional interests have called the question on Bolivian constitutionality.
What will happen next? As the saying goes: Those who know don't say and those who say don't know.

The Democracy Center, based in Cochabamba Bolivia and San Francisco California, works globally to advance human rights through a combination of investigation and reporting, training citizens in the art of public advocacy, and organizing international citizen campaigns. If you like the Blog, consider becoming a subscriber to The Democracy Center's free e-newsletter by sending us an email at 
11 Comments:
Im going to bookmark this page as a source of info on Bolivia.
Just one thought, Jim. Clearly Santa Cruz have got a point to say that people's votes should have equal weighting, but what they tend to ignore is that even 2001 is some time ago when a country is undergoing huge internal migration especially on the altiplano. In the case of El Alto which is one of the fastest growing cities in Latin America, 2001 census results would dramatically underestimate the current population. So a just result would need a much more recent census, something that is clearly not going to happen.
Hi Jim,
as a newcomer to Bolivia and La Paz I have bookmarked your blog! Will work for Swedish org Diakonia and am utterly confused w/ names, groups, events etc (what was that party again, "No podemos"?). Am writing own blog but in Swedish and not so insightful just yet (more of the "how long does it take to get a Bolivian driver´s licence" kind)...
it's also interesting how the constitutionally mandated votes of Bolivians resident abroad, mostly in Argentina and USA will not be counted. Santac Cruz's congressional caucus wants a representative election, but not that representative!
As far as I understand this things, the Constitutional Tribunal (CT) does not order anything…simply say if a law passed by congress is constitutional thus legal.
The law in question…the electoral law.
The issue of congresional sits was raised by the house of representatives before the law was passed. What did congress do?…they did a “Political pact”!!! that goes against the constitution….mmmm….how many MAS congress men raise their hand to allow this???
Is it the fault of the CT when congress passes an illegal law (one that clearly goes against the constitution)???
Santa Cruz did right, so did Potosi…play by the book (constitution) and the referee (TC) also did right.
Here comes Evo with the spin we always hear in the past, will always hear in the future: “It is the state institutions, the Constitutional Court and behind them are the transnationals, the U.S. embassy, which wants to avert any triumph of the indigenous movement.”
Of course, Evo will never, ever do something wrong. Yeap, the transnationals made the uncostitutional law, sure….at least evo is right…”state institutions”…like congress…how many MAS do we have there?
Conclusion: the worst evil Bolivia has is its polititians. Then again, why do we need so many of them for 9 million people. They are what? 130, plus substitutes, plus the ones that bring them the paper…I just hope, the internet will get rid of them. Think about it, congress men represent people, when people can give their opinion and vote on issues over the internet…why do we need polititians for??
saludos, Javier F.
情趣用品,情趣,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣精品,情趣用品,情趣,AIO交友愛情館,情人歡愉用品,美女視訊,情色交友,情人用品性哥,視訊交友,辣妹視訊,美女交友,性愛,嘟嘟成人網,按摩棒,震動按摩棒,微調按摩棒,情趣按摩棒,逼真按摩棒,G點,跳蛋,
跳蛋,跳蛋,性感內衣,飛機杯,充氣娃娃,情趣娃娃,角色扮演,性感睡衣,後庭區,SM,潤滑液,情趣禮物,威而柔,香水,精油,芳香精油,自慰,自慰套,性感吊帶襪,情趣用品加盟,情人歡愉用品,跳蛋情人娜娜,情趣用品,情人節禮物,情人節,吊帶襪,辣妹視訊,美女交友,情色交友,成人交友,視訊聊天室,美女視訊,視訊美女,情色視訊,免費視訊聊天,視訊交友,視訊聊天,AIO交友愛情館,嘟嘟成人網,成人貼圖
美容整形に携わる美容ドクター専門プロフサイト 美容の杜美容整形に関するお問い合わせ整形することによって絶対的な美を得られるわけではありません。『自分は変わった』という事実を物理的に確認することで、気にな……
引越のことならキング引越センター(株) 引越業界No.1クラスの安さと安心。お客様にあった様々なプランをご用意。秘密厳守なので単身女性も安心のキング引越センター
FX、(外国為替取引)はじめるなら、為替マーケット。- FXの新東京シティ証券外国為替取引はじめるなら、新東京シティ証券の『為替マーケット』。最新FX情報を手に入れてリスクの少ないFX取引!仮想トレードでの外国為替無料体験も
FX
インプラント
アフィリエイト
派遣
キャッシング
クレジットカード 現金化
投資
不動産
データ復旧
コンタクトレンズ
不動産
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home