Book Event this Friday in La Paz, and Our New Video on the Web
For our readers in La Paz, we hope that you will join us this Friday evening for a great event – the presentation of our new book, Dignity and Defiance: Stories from Bolivia's Challenge to Globalization (the Spanish edition). The event will be a joint one with Naomi Klein, who will be presenting her new book, Shock Doctrine. Here are the details:
Book Presentation: Dignity and Defiance and Shock Doctrine
When: Friday, May 2 – 6:30pm
Where: Palacio de Comunicaciones, Ave. Mariscal Santa Cruz, isq. Calle Oruro
Admission: Free
Presenters: Jim Shultz and Naomi Klein (with commentary by other guests)
Hosts: The Democracy Center, Fundación Solon, Editoriales Plural
There will be music and video as well!
Dignity and Defiance, The Video Now on You Tube
Members of The Democracy Center team recently joined with our good friend Ismael Saavedra of the School for International Training to produce a dramatic new video based on Dignity and Defiance. The video, which includes a minute of footage associated with each of the book's eight chapters, can be seen by clicking on the screen above, or on the link here.
Dignity and Defiance on the Web
As promised (after a few technical delays), the Spanish edition of Dignity and Defiance is now available in complete form, for free, on the Internet. You can read it here. We invite you to make all the pirated copies you like. The idea is to get the book into people's hands.
Two Other Important Book Events in Cochabamba This Week
This seems to not only be Autonomy (and Anti-) Week in Bolivia, but Book Week as well. We'd like to draw your attention to two other important book presentations this week here in Cochabamba:
1. Nosotros Somos la Coordinadora: A new book by a collection of authors about the citizens' movement that led the Cochabamba Water Revolt
Friday, May 2: 9am
Auditorium of the Trabajadores Fabriles (Factory Workers Union)
Plaza Principal, northeast corner
2. Shock Doctrine: Cochabamba presentation by Naomi Klein
Saturday, May 3: 9:30 am
CESU
Calle Calama #235, between Nataniel Aguirre and Esteban Arce
Happy reading to all and I hope we see you Friday evening in La Paz.
posted by The Democracy Center at 6:22 PM
The Democracy Center, based in Cochabamba Bolivia and San Francisco California, works globally to advance human rights through a combination of investigation and reporting, training citizens in the art of public advocacy, and organizing international citizen campaigns. If you like the Blog, consider becoming a subscriber to The Democracy Center's free e-newsletter by sending us an email at 
24 Comments:
FROM RADIO NETHERLANDS
The Shell oil company is under great pressure from the Bolivian government to reduce its presence in the country, or even to withdraw completely. President Evo Morales issued an ultimatum at the end of March, giving the company till 30 April to agree to sell off its activities to the Bolivian state.
The date is not a coincidence, as 1 May marks the second anniversary of the nationalisation of oil and gas concerns by the president soon after he came to office. Morales arranged for the oil platforms to be occupied by the military, which hung up banners with the text ‘Property of Bolivia’.
The international oil companies now have to inform the government exactly how much gas and oil they are pumping, and must pay more for it from now on. Bolivia has one of the biggest gas reserves in Latin America, but has hardly profited from it in the past.
Privatisation
A second measure taken by the president concerns the extraction, transport and distribution of gas and oil. Since 1 May 2006, the Bolivian state has striven for a majority share in all activities within the oil sector. Negotiations were started with three former subsidiaries of the state oil company YPFB that were privatised in the 1990s.
President Morales, a socialist, wants to buy back these companies, but has made little progress in the past two years. He claims that the oil companies are delaying talks. Morales hasn’t said what will happen if no agreement is reached by 30 April.
Minority share
One of the three companies that must hand over its activities by 1 May is Transredes, which is responsible for practically all gas and oil transportation in Bolivia. Shell holds 25 percent of the shares in Transredes. The Bolivian state oil company YPFB holds 34 percent, and wants to acquire Shell’s share. Shell has known this for some time.
President Morales had direct talks with Shell management during a visit to the Netherlands in November 2006. According to Bolivian Energy Minister Carlos Villegas, Shell said at the time it was willing to sell off its shares.
Crucial
Shell spokesman Wim van de Wiel confirms that negotiations are taking place, but denies any knowledge of the ultimatum. The outcome is crucial for Shell in Bolivia because Transredes is Shell’s only activity in the country. Shell bought the shares in the 1990s when the Bolivian oil and gas sector was privatised. Their current value is estimated at around two billion euros.
"Losing the shares would not be a commercial disaster, but certainly a strategic setback. Shell wants to remain in Bolivia and has its eye on eventual future investment in the gas sector."
CHECK THIS OUT!
(JIMBO IS MOTHER THERESA NEXT TO THIS GUY!)
FROM:
"RENEGADE EYE
THIS BLOG IS SECULAR, INTERNATIONALIST, AND SOCIALIST. THE WRITERS COME FROM THE ANTI-STALINIST LEFT. POLITICS, ART, SEX, AND CULTURE SOUP SERVED HERE. SPICED WITH ARGENTINE TANGO, FLAMENCO, AND JAZZ."
The oligarchy in Bolivia has launched a major challenge to the Evo Morales government in the form of a referendum on an "Autonomous Statute" in the Eastern Department of Santa Cruz. The Statue, if passed in this unconstitutional referendum, would give Santa Cruz amongst others, the right to pass its own laws, particularly on issues like land reform, control revenues over natural resources located in the region, set its own budget and most important of all, create its own security forces. The plan of the oligarchy, as explained by Santa Cruz's prefect, is that this would be followed by similar referendums in Beni, Pando and Tarija, the other Departments that make up Bolivia's Media Luna Oriental (Eastern Crescent).
In effect, what the coalition of wealthy landowners, capitalist agribusinesses and key sections of the Bolivian ruling class are attempting is a unilateral declaration of independence so that they will not have to implement the laws passed by the MAS government of Evo Morales, particularly in relation to land reform and hydrocarbons. This is a very powerful coalition, that has been described as the "100 clans", which controls large amounts of land (25 million hectares as opposed to 5 million hectares which are in the hands of 2 million poor peasants), meat packing plants, the profitable business of soy bean plantations, the country's main banks and media and the main private industries. They are defending their class interests and they are prepared to go until the end and use any means necessary.
They have used the issue of "autonomy" to mobilise mass support for what in reality is a rebellion of the slaveholders, to use Marx's expression. At the same time they have been arming thousands of young people, recruited from the sons of the wealthy and from lumpen elements, in what can only be described as the fascist gangs of the Union Juvenil Cruceña. With a strong element of racism against the "Highland Indios", people with dark, indigenous, skin have been beaten up, lists of MAS activists pasted on the main square in Santa Cruz, a city where only right-wing political activity is now allowed. Evo Morales himself has been called a "monkey" by leading figures in the Santa Cruz "Civic" Committee.
There are clear indications of involvement of the US embassy in this movement of the upper class. At the beginning of April Evo Morales denounced the fact that the government had discovered an office of the CIA within the presidential palace. This had been set up by a former high-ranking officer of the national police who, under the pretext of fighting terrorism, was passing vital information to the CIA. A government minister also denounced the fact that 93 million dollars of USAID had gone directly to opposition groups and organisations in the last year.
But how did we get to this point? As a by-product of the revolutionary movement of the Bolivian workers and peasants in 2000-05, the MAS (Movement Towards Socialism) of Evo Morales got a resounding victory in the elections in December 2005, with more than 53% of the votes against 28% of his closest rival. Even in Santa Cruz the result was good for the MAS, with 33%, even though it lost to Podemos with 41%.
As we said at the time, "the hundreds of thousands of workers and peasants voted for the MAS with a clear idea in mind, that Morales will deliver on the ‘October Agenda', that is, the demands that led to the October 2003 uprising. These are, mainly, the nationalisation and industrialisation of gas, land reform, reversal of neo-liberal policies and, for some, the calling of a Constituent Assembly."
What policies did the MAS government implement? If one thing has characterised the Morales government over the last two years it has been vacillation. Every step forward taken in the right direction (nationalisation of gas, raising the minimum wage, providing school children with free milk, raising the pensions) was met with fierce opposition from the capitalist class and imperialism. Faced with such opposition the government retreated half a step, called for negotiations and generally conciliated. This only encouraged the oligarchy to step up its campaign, created confusion amongst the supporters of the MAS (the masses of workers and poor peasants from the indigenous majority) and demobilised them. The oligarchy was able to seize the initiative and even win a base of support amongst the masses in the Eastern Crescent.
Even when the MAS leadership attempted to use the mass movement against the right wing, it did so in an indecisive way, avoided a serious confrontation and stayed firmly within the narrow limits of bourgeois legality (at a time when the oligarchy was happy to break their own laws in order to defend their land, interest and profits). This was the case for instance one year ago in Cochabamba. When the prefect of Cochabamba (the area where the MAS was born and had massive support in the 2005 elections) came out in favour of autonomy, the MAS leaders called for massive mobilisations of protest. The prefect used the police against the demonstrators and that was the spark that lit the fire. The enraged masses gathered in a massive cabildo abierto in the main town square voted to expel the prefect from the department and to give themselves a new government. What was the response of vice-president García Linera? He argued that the prefect should be respected because he had been legitimately and democratically elected and that the people should go back to their homes. Such a policy could only have two effects: to disorient and demobilise the workers and peasants and to further encourage the oligarchy.
And so it happened. Earlier this year, after many negotiations, the mediation of the Catholic Church, meetings and talks, etc., both the government and the oligarchy announced the calling of a referendum: the government in order to pass the new Political Constitution of the State (as drafted over many months of legalistic disputes by the Constituent Assembly, but only passed at a session which was boycotted by the opposition), and the Santa Cruz oligarchy in order to pass their own Autonomous Statute in a direct challenge and in contradiction with the Political Constitution of the State (CPE). Then, the National Electoral Court ruled that, because of procedural matters, both referendums were unconstitutional and had to be cancelled. The government probably breathed a sigh of relief; this was a way of avoiding a confrontation that they did not want to face. They accepted the ruling.
However, the oligarchy, emboldened by each concession on the part of the government, felt strong enough to defy the ruling and go ahead with its own referendum on autonomy. Since then there have been constant skirmishes between the central national democratically elected government and the decisive section of the country's ruling class represented by the Santa Cruz Departmental government and the Santa Cruz Civic Committee (led by wealthy landowner and agro-capitalist Branko Marinkovic).
A few months ago there was the incident over who controlled the Santa Cruz airport. After having sent the Army to take it over, the government, once again, backed down and effectively handed it over to the Department.
More recently there was a conflict over the decision of the government to block exports of basic foodstuffs in order to face rising prices and scarcity at home. Marinkovic is one of the country's largest cattle ranchers and soybean producers (for the export market). The oligarchy replied with a bosses' lock-out and threatened a national lock-out of the transport industry. The government eased the blocking of exports.
Then the Santa Cruz Department disconnected the computers dealing with its budget from those of the national government. The national government cut off money transfers to Santa Cruz.
But in all these battles, the only one force than can save the Bolivian revolution and also the MAS government, has been absent: the masses of workers and peasants. The miners' union and several peasant organisations made an appeal to the government to use all means necessary to stop the May 4th referendum in Santa Cruz. They clearly saw it as a threat to all they had fought for. What was the answer of the MAS leaders? When asked about it, Garcia Linera replied that the referendum was "just an opinion poll" and when Evo Morales was asked what he was going to do about it he said literally: "Nothing. I believe in the consciousness of the Bolivian people".
The oligarchy is launching a serious and well-organised challenge to the government of Evo Morales and the government is basically burying its head under the sand. It is not even clear that the aim of the ruling class is to split the country. Why should they do that? So far they have managed to get a stronghold in Santa Cruz, Beni, Pando and Tarija. They also have strong positions in Cochabamba and Sucre, and even the prefect of the capital La Paz has now come out in favour of autonomy for Santa Cruz. There are certainly more extreme sections of the oligarchy (represented by Marinkovic's Civic Committee) that would not hesitate in going all the way towards independence. But others are probably thinking that on the back of this movement they can force the overthrow of the Morales government and put an end to the revolutionary movement of the masses, and then they would not need to split the country.
However, not all is lost in Bolivia. At any time, all these reactionary provocations can lead to a massive movement of workers and peasants. Herein lies the only hope for the future. As in the case of Venezuela, appeals to dialogue, conciliation, the bringing in of mediators, did not prevent the ruling class from organising one attempt after another to overthrow the Chavez government. In each occasion it was only the mass mobilisation of workers and peasants in the streets that defeated the counter-revolutionary attempts. In Bolivia in the last few years the masses have shown over and over again their willingness to sacrifice in the struggle for a better future, they have overthrown three governments, faced the army and the police. In April 1952 the miners single-handedly defeated and crushed the army in what was the beginning of the Bolivian revolution. That feat can be repeated again on condition that a clear lead is given. A massive show of strength can disband the forces of reaction.
The miners of Huanuni, in a statement on April 4th clearly identified the danger: "The wealthy oligarchy, a minority composed of land owners and multinational businessmen... with the massive resources derived from their economic power and the open support of countries aligned with the US have started a serious offensive to recover all the political power they lost during the bloody struggles of 2003 and 2005"
But they add: "The national government of the MAS, is also responsible for this situation for having allowed this small minority of the rich to reorganise and raise its head again. This oligarchic minority is so powerful because they have the economic power they derive from the exploitation of our natural resources, like the hydrocarbons, mining, the land, etc. If the government does not take over these resources for the state, these vampires will continue to be powerful and will ensure the continuation of unemployment, poverty and the misery we have lived in for the last decades."
And they end up with a clear appeal for action: "Only the application of the Agendas of 2003 and 2005 will guarantee the disarming and the defeat of the oligarchy. The Huanuni miners demand that the government takes the boldest measures to disband the fraud of this autonomy referendum, and to apply once and for all real structural changes in the country. The miners, loyal to our tradition of revolutionary struggle, demand that the government gives us the necessary means and resources to smash the "civic" and business cliques which throughout the country, and particularly in the Eastern Crescent, fool the people and want to fill the country with hatred, blood and division".
One lesson must be learnt above all: the last two years of the MAS government prove in a conclusive manner that no middle way is possible, no "Andean capitalism" can be built. Even the timid measures of the Morales government have led directly to this rebellion of the slaveholders. The only way forward is the expropriation of the land, banks and industry under the democratic control of the working people of Bolivia, linking up with the revolutionary movements taking place throughout Latin America.RENEGADE EYE
If that guy is "anti-Stalinist", then I am Wayna Qhapac.
Runescape Powerleveling,Runescape Money,Runescape Gold
Runescape Powerleveling
Runescape Money
Runescape Gold
http://www.powerleveling-runescape.com
I will not criticize Jim's admitted desire to become a "Magnifica" this time because he provided a free link to the book and I won't have to spend imperialist dollars on it.
;-)
The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina
I guess 400,000 oligarchs can't be wrong! Isn't the voice of the people what counts in a democracy? Or has that part been forgotten?
Bert
Bert: They've all been hoodwinked!! Didn't you get the message?
N. Klein's Shock Doctrine Book is a MUST for anyone trying to understand the connections of why Bolivians voted by a historic 54% against the SAPs (Structural Adjustment Policies) implemented by the minorities ruling Bolivia before Jan 2006.
I hope it is available in Spanish for those who make it to the various Bolivia events.
Kudos to Democracy Center for bringing someone of this caliber to Bolivia and better yet for her to witness and report on the expected shinnanigans of the then DEFEATED and, (through mistakes/miscalculations of the Morales-Garcia government) now RESUCITATED few subservients to the privatizers and profiteers of the world.
Boliviana Me
Jim,
You know many of us don´t care about your writing, but please tell us more about Klein´s book. Some of us minorities can´t be in La Paz nor in Cocharpampa before May 4th.
Ano 1:35 AM, please check your numbers again, only 47% of those that voted in the last presidential election in Bolivia did it for Evo Morales and the maSSist party, the 53% “legal” number come up because the null and blank votes were not taken in account; but those where also votes not in favor of the Morales agenda.
In addition, most of the people voting for the maSSist in the election had no idea about what you called SAP, neither do their present partisans. A great percentage of them is not going to be foolish enough to vote for Evo again; best case example, the fact the maSSist do not want their abortion of proposal for new constitution to be put under the Bolivian vote because isn’t going to win.
bolivre:
How much did you get pay to write this? $47 or $54 per arcicle. I guess you are cheap.
Parents in Santa Cruz report that their children are forced to attend to the assembly
Santa Cruz, Parents in Santa Cruz reported that their children, students of school and universities, are being forced and threatened to attend to the assembly which will take place this afternoon at Santa Cruz's capital.
Bolivia Libre (What a misnomer that is!)
"the 53% “legal” number come up because the null and blank votes were not taken in account; but those where also votes not in favor of the Morales agenda."
Votes that are null and void are just that, null and void. They are not "votes" against Morales' agenda. They are not votes, pure and simple.
And what kind of perverted mind could come up with that sort of twisted conclusion?
Ano 5:59 PM; that is just fine with me; I asume you don't mind me use your approach when dealing with the results of the Santa Cruz referendum next monday; cheers.
bolulibre:
Get a decent job, stop prostituing yourself for golberg. Or go home to santa cruz where the narrow minds of sellouts like you are in vogue. Sorry malinche you are.
From one Santa Cruz parent, my child is not being obliged to to attend to the assembly. I know of no parent who's child is being obliged to do any such thing. Admitted, I haven't spoken to all SC parents, but I find anon 5:07's statement dubious.
In this age of emerging entities such as the European Union the retrograde “civicos” (Marinkovic the Croat and Co.) are planning to turn back the clock and create a BANANA REPUBLIC. Long Live the Banana Republic of the Media Luna (Half moon).
Franco
I hope this book by Naomi Klein is better than the prefabricated money-waster Fences and Windows turned out to be.
No Logo is by far one of the best business books I ever read (I guess that wasn't her intention when writing it though); If Shock Doctrine comes even close I'll be glad to spend the 40 bolivianos a pirated copy goes for.
Tyler Cowen's review is a bit disheartening though:
"... Above the excited recitation stands Milton Friedman as the überdemon of the march toward global tyranny and squalor.
Ms. Klein's rhetoric is ridiculous. For instance, she attaches import to the fact that the word "tank" appears in the label 'think tank'..."
http://www2.nysun.com/article/63867?page_no=1
Anyway...I'm just being honest.
World Of Warcraft,WOW Gold,World Of Warcraft Gold,Power Level,Power Leveling,WOW Power Leveling,World Of Warcraft Power Leveling,cheap ,wow gold,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy WOW Gold,buy cheap World Of Warcraft Gold,WOW Gold,Power Leveling, WOWGoldWorld Of Warcraft PowerLeveling,WOW Power Leveling,World Of Warcraft Gold Power Leveling.
Shenzhen Galarm Gas Alarm,Producted,Gas Alarm,Alcohol,Tester,Alcohol Tester,Breathalyser,Breathalyser,Breathalyzer,Breathalyzer,Smoke Alarm,Co Alarm,Gas Alarm,Detector,Gas Detector,Co Detector,Smoke Alarm,Co AlarmPortable Gas Detector,Co Alarm,Co Detector,Shenzhen Galarm Co Gas Alarm,Co Gas Detector.
生产液压升降机,定做各种升降机,固定式升降机,移动式升降机.经销各种不锈钢弹簧,弹簧,拉伸弹簧,压缩弹簧,数据库修复,磁盘阵列数据恢复,数据恢复,RAID修复,raid数据恢复,数据恢复,RAID数据恢复,服务器修复,硬盘数据恢复, 树化玉,服务器数据恢复,RAID服务器数据恢复, google排名
World Of Warcraft,WOW Gold,World Of Warcraft Gold,Power Level,Power Leveling,WOW Power Leveling,World Of Warcraft Power Leveling,cheap ,wow gold,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy WOW Gold,buy cheap World Of Warcraft Gold,WOW Gold,Power Leveling, WOWGoldWorld Of Warcraft PowerLeveling,WOW Power Leveling,World Of Warcraft Gold Power Leveling.
Shenzhen Galarm Gas Alarm,Producted,Gas Alarm,Alcohol,Tester,Alcohol Tester,Breathalyser,Breathalyser,Breathalyzer,Breathalyzer,Smoke Alarm,Co Alarm,Gas Alarm,Detector,Gas Detector,Co Detector,Smoke Alarm,Co AlarmPortable Gas Detector,Co Alarm,Co Detector,Shenzhen Galarm Co Gas Alarm,Co Gas Detector.
生产液压升降机,定做各种升降机,固定式升降机,移动式升降机.经销各种不锈钢弹簧,弹簧,拉伸弹簧,压缩弹簧,数据库修复,磁盘阵列数据恢复,数据恢复,RAID修复,raid数据恢复,数据恢复,RAID数据恢复,服务器修复,硬盘数据恢复, 树化玉,服务器数据恢复,RAID服务器数据恢复, google排名
Hey JaiRO and Boluli...
Are you bedfellows? If not, you should be. You seem like you would enjoy each other's company.
Shock is what the middle and poor classes experienced as they were rapidly getting poorer and poorer thanks to Friedman inspired--Jeff Sach's prescriptions dutily followed by Goni. Whether they knew the official jargon for those reasons was SAPs is irrelevant, they KNEW they were getting poorer while the very rich were getting very very rich.
Without the Gonis who implement the--let me and buddies get richer quickly policies-- Ol' Milton would just be another pundit punding his wares. Put that in both your tanks, you do have them?
Boliviana Me
Oh and Norman...did you notice you stutter when you lie?
Well, I went back through my comment to see what you were referring to and drew a blank. Can you be more specific?
"Hey JaiRO and..."
Is this supposed to be insulting?
I see this blog's comment section hasn't change much since I last stopped by (perhaps a year ago). What a shame.
Clan Wars and Bounty Hunter did a fair job of offering new PvP gaming choices, but they weren't without their problems; in particular, Bounty Hunter was dominated by large clans, which just wasn't how we intended Bounty Hunter to be used. We are aware that this week's Bounty Hunter changes leaves only Clan Wars for multi-way fighters, which does not offer the level of danger and reward that Bounty Hunter did. We can reveal that changes to the Clan Wars arena are at a proposal stage and future multi-way minigames are planned, all of which should alleviate these concerns.
It must also be said that Clan Wars and Bounty Hunter were never alone intended as a replacement for the Wilderness.hero online goldimvu creditskal geonknight goldlast chaos goldlineage adenalineage 2 adenalord of the rings goldlotro goldwow goldworld of warcraft goldbuy wow goldcheap wow goldwow power levelingwow powerlevelingwow goldworld of warcraft gold We saw them as the first in a series of PvP minigames, with other games being briefed that would attempt to cater for all types of PKer. buy wow goldcheap wow goldwow power levelingwow powerlevelingwow goldworld of warcraft goldbuy wow goldcheap wow goldwow power levelingwow powerlevelingeverquest 2 goldeq2 platffxi gilfinal fantasy xi gilmaple story mesosmaplestory mesosmaplestory mesolotro goldlotr goldlord of the ring goldlineage adenalineage 1 adenaWell, the next PvP minigame lineage 2 adenabuy lineage 2 adenalineage ii adenacheap lineage 2 adenaeverquest 2 goldeq2 platffxi gilfinal fantasy xi gilmaple story mesosmaplestory mesosmaplestory mesolotro goldlotr goldlord of the ring goldlineage adenalineage 1 adenalineage 2 adenabuy lineage 2 adenalineage ii adenacheap lineage 2 adenalotro goldlotr goldlord of the ring goldmaple story mesosmaplestory mesosis now finishing development and entering the first round of quality assurance. maplestory mesoeverquest 2 goldeq2 platffxi gilfinal fantasy xi gillineage adenalineage 1 adenalineage 2 adenabuy lineage 2 adenalineage ii adenacheap lineage 2 adenarunescape goldrunescape moneyrunescape goldrunescape moneyWe're certainly very excited about this single-way, runescape goldrunescape moneysilkroad goldbuy silkroad goldsilkroad goldbuy silkroad goldcity of villains infamycov infamyEverQuest goldEverQuest platbuy eq goldeq plateverquest platinumwow levelingwow golddofus kamaskamas dofusdofus kamaskamas dofusdofus kamaskamas dofus
one-versus-one safe minigame.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home