Bolivia’s Maybe Election
Two weeks from today Bolivia will vote in a historic election, with the political heads of the President, Vice-President, and eight of the nation’s nine governors on the line.Or maybe it will just be another Sunday.
Such is the uncertain world of Bolivian politics these days.
The Run-Up to the Recall Vote
The national ‘revocatoria’ vote scheduled for August 10 is the product of an odd political chess game that President Evo Morales and his opposition have been playing out for more than a year. As we have written about here before, the idea of the “vote-on-everyone-one-more-time” was first launched by embattled Cochabamba Governor Manfred Reyes Villa in January 2007, after the region exploded in violent confrontations between his supporters and Morales’. Then it languished, only to be resurrected even more oddly by the opposition in Congress in May, which signed onto a lopsided voting formula favored by Evo.
Sometimes in Bolivian politics you can only interpret people’s actions one of two ways. They are either so incredibly Machiavellian that mere mortals such as myself can’t possibly understand the grand strategy involved, or politicians here are just incredibly foolish.
In any event, with two weeks to go until the maybe-election – I’ll get to the ‘maybe’ part in a minute – evidence of the ‘epic vote’ is pretty minor here in Cochabamba. A couple of weeks ago MAS backers opened up a couple of local campaign offices to modest turnouts and the sounds of off-key tubas. Evo’s opponents are slightly less visible. Yesterday they hung a series of banners down Calle Americas, a central strip in the city’s affluent northern neighborhoods. “No MAS Muertos [No More Deaths]”, “No MAS Venezuelas.” What it may lack in strategy the opposition makes up for in catchy slogans.
There is also that nifty full-page in today's Los Tiempos featuring an array of legal experts calling for the suspension of the vote. I really did think it was a news feature, until I spotted the fine print "solicitude" in the top right hand corner, "advertisement". Shall we take bets on which regional governor with a famous moustache paid for it?
Evo meanwhile is making the rounds at rallies in some of the region’s rural areas. Here in the metropolis of rural Tiquipaya the only evidence I have seen so far from the campaign is a lone MAS sound truck at the Sunday market this morning, draped in the Bolivian flag and a Whipala.
In other words, while most of the commentators writing about the coming vote from abroad have amped it up us a major political drama, most Bolivians I know seem to care much more about the fact that 1 Boliviano now gets you just two rolls of bread (it used to buy you 5) and that the local trufi drivers blocked the road here for two days in a dispute over routes.
More to the point, all this is in wild contrast to the feel of things here in December 2005, when Morales was first elected. You could not step foot into the streets without being struck on the head by an election banner, or being run over by a sound truck, or offered a leaflet. The campaign atmosphere was electric. Not this time. Not yet at least.
The Maybe-Election
Bolivian politics has developed a long habit of being operated under rules that are never quite clear, sort of like the games designed by my five-year-old daughter. What kind of vote does it take for a Constituent Assembly to approve a new constitution? Can regions unilaterally declare their autonomy? Quien sabe? Who knows? The rules governing the ‘revocatoria’ vote are no exception.
Last week the sole remaining magistrate on the National Constitutional Court (in Bolivia this is separate from the National Supreme Court) declared that the vote should not be held. Her logic – the failure of Morales and the Congress to agree on appointments to the other two Court slots has left it without the ability to adequately rule on challenges to the election’s constitutionality, and therefore it should not take place. Meanwhile the National Electoral Court, which has responsibility to organize the vote, has declared otherwise.
To no one’s surprise, those who favor the vote and those who oppose it (Morales backers and backers of the threatened Governors, respectively) have taken sides on the constitutional questions in accordance with their politics. Who is right? What will happen? Quien sabe?
Odd Positioning
Then there is the quite odd positioning of the various politicians involved, acts of political contortion that have left several of the nation’s leaders looking as much like pretzels as they do candidates.
There is Manfred Reyes Villa, the elected Governor of Cochabamba. His position is as follows: He proposed the vote in the first place but now says it is illegitimate and won’t campaign or accept the results of he loses – though he probably will if he wins. And he also announced last week that, while the vote is unconstitutional and illegitimate, everyone should go to the polls in two weeks and vote No on Evo. Just in case I suppose.
Then there is Evo. On the one hand he is trying to campaign on what he considers to be a record of accomplishment. Last week I was on the receiving end of a pair of widely circulated e-mails generated (at taxpayer expense) from the Ministry of the Presidency. Slick presentations, adorned with both the government emblem and Evo’s campaign logo touted bar graphs showing the steep rises under his tenure in government spending for public works and services – the bread and butter of politics here.
On the one hand one might take that as a sign that Evo is reaching out once more to the urban middle class that joined with his natural rural base to back him in 2005 – I am guessing that the e-mails and PDF files were not intended for the residents of Tapacari. But on the other hand Evo seems quite clear that he is campaigning primarily to mobilize that rural base again, in ways not likely to sooth city-dwellers and the middle class.
Yesterday in a speech to the core of his base (and one of the more radical elements of it) the cocaleros, Evo returned to the themes and attacks that are always certain to win cheers from his backers and give nervous pause to those on the fence. He attacked the lone Constitutional magistrate by name, declaring her to be an enemy of democracy and an insult to Bolivian women. He declared his other opponents to be tools of neoliberals and the U.S. and all a part of the same regimes responsible for the deaths of the nation’s martyrs, from Tupak Katari on down.
There is of course, no doubt, that a core of the opposition to Evo springs from a deep well of antagonism by wealthy interests threatened by his rule and by racism in response to his existence as the nation’s first indigenous President.
But that alone does not explain the people who sit next to me in a dilapidated Toyota station wagon in the morning, the working poor headed into the city for a long day of work. The objections of the elite and the racism of many does not account for the declarations of, “Ayyy Evo, he just wants to fight with everyone,” or, “He said he was going to make things better, but it is all just the same.”
It may well be that, as polls suggest, Evo is headed for a victory in two weeks. But if I were MAS or Morales I’d be plenty worried about that mom sitting next to me in the back seat. Politically deserved or not, it is that kind of antipathy from people that once supported you that carries the makings of a defeat. It is also the kind of opinion and expression that gets left out by those writing about the vote based reports via their computer screen.
71 Comments:
Jim,
You would do well to take your own advice and start featuring Bolivian voices on your site. Those reading reports via their computer screen are tired of reading the off hand musings of a gringo for analysis.
nice summary- can't say i'm tired of your gringo musings. there are plenty of periodicals and blogs for other musings.
wanted to mention in la paz there is some radio propoganda too in preparation for the 10th.
Also, just how much government expense was required for emails? that sounded odd. anyways i haven't seen them, maybe you can link them.
cheers
Anon 3:50, do you know any Bolivians doing political analysis in English? I'd love to read them if you do.
As for the first comment above, can someone explain to me the mentality of people who seem to hate this Blog so much but also seem so glued to it that they post a comment within 5 minutes of anything new?
This guy is probably one of those who also trash everytime there is a post by the Bolivians at The Democracy Center.
Maybe the Bolivian voice he is looking for is Goni's.
Thank you for the analysis. Gringo or not, an outside perspective that has some appreciation of complexity of the situation is very valuable. If i just read El Deber, I'd never understand. And too much of what I read in the US on either the left or right imposes our own hopes and fears: We are very reluctant to remember that for the people actually living there, whether a person can govern or not is actually more important than whether he is leftist/indigenous/Chavista/antineoliberal or not.
@scottorscottie
i would recommend political science professor miguel centellas
http://mcentellas.com/
Ohhh, Jim, and you were so surprised on being in the receiving end of a maSSist e-mail; wake up body, they want you to print it and distribute it in Tiquipaya; just don’t cry later on when Evo critizises you for not helping and being a coward just like Chavez did when he loss in his last referendum.
You don’t see the maSSist propaganda machine in your living area because that never come from the people, it come from the regime’s arcas which is very bussy spending in those places that don’t favor them now a days. O yes, and in anti rock trowing cambas and police with bad tear gas aiming.
The recall referendum is unconstitutional and I will not be surprised if Evo decides to play the democracy game after he loses, accepting the naming of the additional constitutional judges, the good ones, that have nothing to do with his party; which will have to meet and say that the vote was not valid because it was unconstitutional.
INVESTIGATE THE FORTUNES OF MANFRED REYES, COSTAS, PEPE LUCHO, AND THE REST OF THE PREFECTOS.
Check the bank accounts of Bolivialibre to see how much money he is getting from USAID
Anon 10:59PM wrote: "Check the bank accounts of Bolivialibre to see how much money he is getting from USAID"
With all due respect, don't you mean "check under Bolivialibre's matress to see how much dollars he is getting from USAID"? :-)
BoliviaLibre wants to "Interrupt the implementation of a racist fascist and totalitarian regime in Bolivia."
BoliviaLibre-Bolivialibre-ra-ra-ra!
He is a real hero...the sandwich type.
He is according to his Blog profile a "Democracy Figther"...? Does that mean he fights democracy? I am confused.
Hey BLT it's spelled FIGHTER.
Franco
Yo no vote por Evo para que nacionalizara cosas, se deje manipular por Chavez, o para que empieze a regalar bonos a todo el mundo. Yo vote por Evo para gente como este sinverguenza sea arrestado para luego ser colgado de la pasarela de la Perez y dejar que su cuerpo se pudra y sea comido por cuervos. Pepelucho no es ni "neoliberal" ni "socialista" es un simple ladron que no merece ni juicio, ni clemencia, o ningun trato civilizado, simplemente merece ser ejecutado a sangre fria.
Finally something positive from the ano maSSistas, thank you ano Franco, I will change the word fighter as soon as I can. Don’t get confuse, it means I fight for democracy in my country, off course you already new this.
Ano 10:59 PM and Grindio, come check my mattress, but I suggest you do it after the totalitarian regime of Evo implements the socialism of the XXI century in the country, if we let him. I have no intentions to see what you did with Chavez money, you both are no more that the flea on the macaco.
Evo's pic looks as if telling himself "I'm sooooo ____________!!!!!!(fill in the blank)
a)stupid
b)ugly
c)llunk'u or asskisser
d)dumb
e)ignorant
f)etc
@scottorscottie
you may also try:
Dan Moriartys blog
Bolivia Rising
Abiding in Bolivia
Bolivia Changes
Norman's Blog
Too bad Jim doesn't believe in blogrolls I guess.
Mr. Bolivia Libre, are you confusing Evito with Victor Paz Estenssoro, one of the leaders of the 1952 Revolution and 4 times president who did in fact look like a monkey/macaco and was therefore known by everyone as El Mono?
Otherwise, dang that is pretty racist man. I usually only hear that from my white middle class family and friends in the safety of their homes, not from "freedom fighters" on the net!!!
Looks like today the CNE's dissenting member has given in to the majority, so no matter what ALL of the private press says about the CDE's acting up, the referendum is on!!! (maybe)
As the above anonimo, I think many of us see this as at least an opportunity to get out the crap career politicians like Pepelucho, Manfred, Suarez, Lopez, Cossio (Prefects of La Paz, Cochabamba, Beni, Pando, and Tarija) although Evo's temporary hand-picked replacements may suck(then again protests will probably fast forward us right to new direct elections). hopefully the people can have another chance to vote for true regional leaders.
so it's been less than a week since the meeting with Mr. Shannon and Evo is now accusing the US Embassy of financing media spots against him and all sorts of the usual crazy.
State Dept people: Are you really that naive? Did you seriously think Evo was going to change anything in his rethoric just because Golberg boss met with him?
You should by now realize that there is absolutely nothing you can do, say, or not do in order to get Evo to "play nice" or "like you." He, like of his followers, wants to see the US destroyed. After all they wanted to make 9/11 a national holiday.
You must realize that he will never ever be friedly to the US, and starting with this fact it is that you should formulate your policy...and please don't be so stooopid as to try sanctions.
Actually the most racist comments I've heard came last night from Masista Minister Hector Arce on PAT's Usted Decide, Arce, a white Bolivian, was telling Savina Cuellar that she was being used and duped by oligarch's and the derecha. And to top it off he said that as a mujer indigena she had the duty to support the nation's first "indigenous" president. The condescion was palpable. The show's host and all the commentators were left aghast.Sabina just laughed it off.
Good article as usual, Jim. The usual swivel eyed posts from exteme rightist nutcases and Camba 6th formers putting their American lessons to good use and who would probably seek to arraign Dr.David Steele as a dangerous communist were they given half the chance.
The most important point at this conjecture, surely, is; how heavily armed up and prepped are the Camba and Indigenous militias?
And how likely is the ignition of a regionwide tide of violence?
As for the hgarping about Venezuela, Freedom Fighter Bloke, my partner's grandma spent 3 days on a trolley in a Santa Cruz hospital whilst the doctors were out on protest at being given assistance from Cubans and Venezuelans.
If she had been Venezuelan, Chavez would have seen to it she wouldn't have had to go through something like that.
When was the last time you had to go to the Caja Petrolero when you were ill?
I bet it's the Foiannini (posh private hospital)for your lot.
And what has Costas done to make the gap between rich and poor Camba smaller?
Fuck all, as you know and relish.
Ian: You remind me of the character from the Viz's Student Grant: Grant Wankshaft.
“Don’t get confuse, it means I fight for democracy in my country, off course you already new this.”
Bolivialibre,
A mi parecer, usted esta peleando contra la democracia porque sus mensajes son los comentarios de un mercenario extranjero no los de un patriota boliviano.
Franco
P.D. sobre su escritura en inglés,
Le recomiendo el deletreador automático (spell check) del programa Word para evitar su ortografía atroz y también muchas clases de inglés.
Well, I don't see morales as having much to worry about. I'd be astounded if he loses his office Aug 10th. What concerns me most is the gradual removal of checks and balances - something that most Bush detractors should be able to empathize with. The constitutionality of this measure (the recall referendum) can't even be debated as the Constitutional Court has remained emascualted for almost a year (or has it already been a year - I'm not sure.) morales/MAS has the lower congress and while the opposition controls the Senate, it wouldn't take but a few seats to change that balance. Apparently a few thousand MASistas surrounding the senate has been enough to incapacitate the Senate opposition anyway. The primary check on morales then has been the Prefects. It looks like that's about to disappear. Mind you I no longer think that he's Satan incarnate, (at most, he'sa distant cousin) but for what it's worth, I still would be concerned seeing him go unchecked.
BTW, as far as blog recommendations - I don't qualify. I'm a gringo too.
runescape accounts
cheap runescape gold
buy runescape gp
sell runescape coin
runescape items
cheap runescape money
buy runescape gp
sell runescape coin
mabinogi gold
mabinogi money
mabinogileveling
mabinogi power leveling
mabinogi power leveling
mabinogi gold
Cool picture of Evo. Let's guess:
A. Washing his face after having his nose shoved SO far up Hugo's arse he has to clean behind his ears.
B. Post Baptism, Proclaming himself "Papa de Todo Bolivia"
C. Devine Justice. A little payback perhaps? Washing the teargas from his face flashbacks to the "repression" that occurred outside the US embassy a couple weeks ago?
Funny now the wind changes the effects of teargas. Grindio... Maybe USAID AND the CIA arranged it.
LOL LOL
LOL LOL
LOL LOL
LOL LOL
LOL LOL
LOLLOLLOLLOL
Obama can't put McCain away. Disappointing.
His trip abroad and tons of $$$ no use.
Money> US and his greatest deficit ever, courtesy of sonny bush.
Bolivia greates superavit ever, thanks to daddy EVo.
Great lessons for the masters, who keep waisting money funding the likes of the civicos and bolulibre.
No, Obviously Evo just ate something really cold. He has bain-freeze.
Anon 11:24PM: "Funny now the wind changes the effects of teargas. Grindio... Maybe USAID AND the CIA arranged it."
Wow the political hacks whose volunteer work getting Bush elected got them their first job and whose job at or for the US Mission apparently requires they monitor this blog and spread disinformation have become more detached from reality than ever: Now they imagine some wild scenarios that disparage Evo and want me to comment on it as if it was a fact. The only fact in evidence is that the above-referenced commentator is a kook.
Anon 11:28AM: "Obama can't put McCain away. Disappointing. His trip abroad and tons of $$$ no use."
Huh? Of course Obama "can't put McCain away"; it is the results of the election that will "put McCain away". As for "no use", Obama got a 6 point bump in the polls and leads McCain because he was presidential in the world capitals whereas McCain had to travel to the backwaters like Colombia or Tijuana (or wherever in Mexico) for his trip abroad; Obama was treated like a world leader thus establishing himself as presidential material that can return the US into a leadership role instead of having McCain continue Bush policies that lead to:
1) $10 a gallon gas;
2)falling further behind China and Europe economically;
3)lagging behind India or Brazil technologically or in trade; and
4) Evo getting re-elected on grounds including but not limited to Bolivia's economy becoming stronger than the US as evidenced by the Bolivian peso's rise against the dollar and Evo's fiscal budget surplus while McCain Bush's budget records record deficits.
As Evo builds the infrastructure that develops natural resources and transports it to market via the Atlantic or Pacific oceans, Bolivia will boom after its disenfranchised rural class become educated enough to take advantage of the equal opportunities open to them, some 5 years after Bolivia's civil war shall rid Bolivia of its oligarchy class. Then if grandpa McCain is still president because of another US Supreme Court coup de etat or more rigged elections in Ohio, Florida or wherever, the US can send workers to Bolivia as illegal immigrants seeking economic opportunity like Norman in his beat-up Ford. At that point the US will no longer be first world but more like Mexico's twin, including number of Mexican nationals residing there. :-)
McCain beats Obama in likely to vote poll.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-07-28-poll_N.htm
A has-been like Evo?
"A has-been like Evo?"
Huh?
"Bush to leave a record budget deficit of $482 billion...Democrats blame Bush's tax cuts and fiscal management. ("Maura Reynolds, LA Times, July 29, 2008)
I'd rather be a "has-been" like Evo than a "never-was" like you and Bush.
In Bolivia and the US, by their right wing's control of the media and their practice of deception, Bush-McCain and the prefectos are bolstered while Evo and US progressives diminished. Being a Bolivia blog. here are facts supporting Evo's excellent fiscal management courtesy of "Boqueron" from the Llajta list on yahoo:
"Bolivia si algo tiene ahorita es bichichis-- HAY CIRCULANTE para quemar como quien diria. Los recursos que ingresan por tema hidrocarburos estan en camino de triplicarse este año. En el 2005 se recibia cerca de 2.9 billones (ojo billones no millones) de bolivianos, el 2006 practicamente se duplico a 5.7 billones de bolivianos, el 2007 paso los 6 billones y se estima que el 2008 alcanzara los 7 BILLONES. En tres años un incremento de 4 BILLONES!!! de bolivianos. En dias recientes Brasil y Venezuela han concedido un credito de alrededor de 8 billones de bolivianos para uno de los corredores transoceanicos.
¿Por que creen que hay Bono Juancito Pinto, Bono Dignad, referendos a diestra y siniestra? Todo esto cuesta plata. En el caso de Santa Cruz los ingresos estan por triplicarse. Tarija se estima que recibira este año, 2 BILLONES de bolivianos, y todavia encima los perros de la media luna quieren hacer paro porque dizque el gobierno no les entrega recursos (en el fondo lo unico que quieren es parar el revocatorio porque bien puede representar el fin de sus dias)... La cierto es que hay una campaña mediatica destructiva digitada por la oligarquia cruceña..."
The link cited above that claimed McCain led Obama had a disclaimer that admits its poll my be wrong and that Obama leads McCain by 8%:
"Obama led McCain 48%-40% among registered voters in a separate Gallup tracking poll over the same three days. Newport said differences were inevitable in two polls conducted simultaneously but were within the margin of error."
My poll is likely voters. Yours is registered voters.
BIG difference! guess which group is likelier to vote?
obama has so much $$$ and arsekissers from the media and he can't pull ahead from a cranky old fart.
We know the deal, Obama and Evo are disliked by the red necks, ultra conservatives, white trash, the crooks, corrupt and assss holes of the world.
Evo and Obama will defeat the mafias of the world, it is time for change, and the entire world supports peace, except the wana be hawks, who never served a day in the armed forces but talk trash as Macho men.
At the end we will win, the Manfreds, Tutos, McCains, bushes of the world will have to wait because this time the lies of the media will not sufice to brain wash the idiots of the country.
The primary with Hillary established two things:
1) There are a lot of red-necked, racists who will vote against even if it is against their economic interests simply because Obama is a black. That was evidenced by numbers of them holding their nose and voting for Hillary. Thus it was established that when the race card is played, Obama cannot close the deal convincingly.
2) The open minded, educated youth and others that were formerly not interested in politics registered to vote and voted in record numbers because of the interest sparked by the Hillary-Obama death match. Case in point: Florida saw 107,000 new voters register as democrats while only 17,000 new Republicans registered.
We'll see who is likely to vote when it counts. $4.50 to $5 a gallon at the pumps when it used to be $1.26 is an awfully persuasive argument that voting matters.
…..”because he was presidential in the world capitals whereas McCain had to travel to the backwaters like Colombia or Tijuana (or wherever in Mexico) for his trip abroad”…
Grindio, your racist views of the world and fascism are only surpassed by your overwheling ignorance in economic matters.
Grindio better keep his ugly racist face hidden lest he fuel the fire of the fear some on the fence conservative have about the patriotism of Obama and his supporters. It is one thing to support a progressive agenda, but quite a different one to support someone who ALWAYS closes his speeches by wishing death to AMERICANS.
Now don't confuse having money in the Treasury with having the country in the path of sustained development. How is the average Bolivian doing? Don't forget most of the increase in money/circulante comes from gas royalties (a gift from those damn "neoliberals,") remesas, and drugs. As far as I know there is no shift in the numbers of informal sector workers to workers who actually pay into AFPs. The MAS should also have an overall plan for the money instead of having Evo inaugurating bridges and giving bonos a diestra y siniestra
Anon 11:42PM wrote: "Grindio better keep his ugly racist face hidden lest he fuel the fire of the fear some on the fence conservative have about the patriotism of Obama and his supporters."
Huh?
"ugly"???
Dude, more than one babe has referenced me and my face as being a "hottie"!
As for Evo's choice of the phrase "Que mueran los yankees", I plan to speak to him about that; it's getting a little old. Most don't understand that Evo means that in a good way in the sense that the term "yankee" stands for the imperialistic, patriarchal, egoist, sexist, carnal, self-centered self in the American psyche. Thus, Evo is actually saying that Americans must be born again, on a spiritual, sensitive, communitarian level that lifts up others.
On "How is the average Bolivian doing?
They are doing better than the average American, who has lost purchasing power whereas the average Bolivian has gained it.
Re: "Don't forget most of the increase in money/circulante comes from gas royalties (a gift from those damn "neoliberals,")..."
When did "neoliberals" create natural resources like gas and place it in the ground? I thought it was God who created the earth and its natural resources.
Re: "The MAS should also have an overall plan for the money instead of having Evo inaugurating bridges and giving bonos a diestra y siniestra"
Evo's "inaugurating bridges" means he's investing in infrastructure while the US's infrastructure is degrading daily. Evo invests the wealth of Bolivia's natural resources into the building of human capital by providing bonos for "diestra y siniestra" so that children can attend school instead of work to help their families survive while the Bush-McCain cabal transfers wealth to the transnationals by way of no bid contracts that build infrastructure in Iraq or Afghanistan.
同声翻译 同声传译 会议设备租赁 同声翻译设备 文件柜 论文发表 同声传译设备租赁 同声传译 表决器租赁 更衣柜 论文发表 会议设备租赁
升降机 升降平台 登车桥 升降机 铝合金升降机 液压机械 升降台 高空作业平台 升降机 升降平台 无缝管 升降平台 弹簧 升降机 数据恢复 升降机 RAID数据恢复 北京心理咨询 服务器数据恢复 液压升降机 无缝钢管 升降平台 博客 升降机 Google排名 网站优化 心理咨询 升降机 升降平台
Cheap WoW Gold, World Of Warcraft Gold,the best WoW PowerLeveling and other MMORPG Power LevelingWOW Gold WOWGold World Of Warcraft Gold WOW Power Leveling WOW PowerLeveling World Of Warcraft Power Leveling World Of Warcraft PowerLeveling
Our company's products are Gas Alarm,Gas Detector,Breathalyser,Breathalyzer,Alcohol Tester,Co Alarm.Breathalyzer Gas Alarm Breathalyser Co Alarm Co Detector Alcohol Tester Alcohol Tester Gas Detector Please select one of our product categories to find out more.
So now EG is an economist....hahahahahaha! what does he know of PPP and what "average" USamerican and Bolivian means? He says he ain't ugly(that's in the eye of the beholder). At least he admits he's racist.
Evo's goin' down!!!!
How about this pearl of wisdom from Evo yesterday:
“Yo he aprendido que, por encima de lo legal, está lo politico. Por eso, cuando mis asesores me dicen ‘Evo, lo que estás haciendo es ilegal’, yo les digo: ’si es ilegal, háganlo legal. Para eso han estudiado…”
There you go, our Andean Mussolini has outlined his vision….
What's Evo's "pearl of wisdom" this time?
This blog is for those who speak the language of Shakespeare, please!
(At least your were courteous enough to abide by the "quality, not quantity" norm)
;-)
The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina
Apparently the wisdom of what Evo said escapes some of the reactionary neanderthals on this list.
Given:
A) If a policy-in its current form-does not conform with constitutional principles; and
B) Evo's staff includes those who have studied constitutional law and how to draft legislation that conforms to the constitution;
then
C) its wise for Evo to request his staff's learned constitutional scholars to offer permutations of said policy that conform with the letter of the law.
What's not wise about that? When informed By the US Supreme Court of the unconstitutionality of certain anti-terrorist policies, Bush did the same thing. It's the lawful course of action that presidents take to implement policies that seek solvency or a comparative advantage or net benefit to harms within the status quo.
As to the wild deceptive claim that I am a racist, setting aside the lack of reading comprehension skills of Anon 8:18AM, it is not racist to compare the countries and capitals Obama visited with those visited ineffectually by McCain. Nor is it racist to state that if one has to choose between Paris and Mexico's DF, Paris wins the contest every time. That would be according to all criteria, particularly in terms of significance on the global stage. It goes unsaid that even if one regarded the locales equally, at none of the places McCain visited did he draw any crowd to hear him speak. That speaks volumes when compared to the 200,000 people that went to see Obama speak in Germany or the throngs that treated him like a rockstar where he spoke.
ERRATA: Actually the evidence shows that Bush did not limit himself to conforming with the law like Evo is trying to do. Instead he recruited evil people to do his dirty work:
'According to an article by New Yorker staff writer Jane Mayer in the latest New York Review of Books, "President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and a small handful of trusted advisors sought and obtained dubious legal opinions [on national security] enabling them to circumvent American laws and traditions." She details how they used these legal opinions to dramatically expand executive power.'
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-rutten30-2008jul30,0,1894974.column
Is it not a fact that Bush-Cheney did the same thing in the State Department with their many suspect hires that infect the US Mission (and consequently our blog with their vile attempts to deceive this blog's readers)?
“Yo he aprendido que, por encima de lo legal, está lo politico. Por eso, cuando mis asesores me dicen ‘Evo, lo que estás haciendo es ilegal’, yo les digo: ’si es ilegal, háganlo legal. Para eso han estudiado…”
"I've learned that, above what is legal, there is policy (or politics). Given that, when my advisors tell me 'Evo, what you are doing is illegal', I tell them: 'if it isn't legal, make it legal. That's why you studied..."
E-G, your interpretation is a stretch. you can understand our confusion when it sounds as if Mr. morales does not wish to respect the law, but rather wishes to bend the law and reshape it to his will. Galloglass, could you give us some context? Where did this quote come from?
Thanks, Norman. It's apparent that Morales and his band of monolito lovers want to do what Chavez did: be elected to the presidency and then slowly modify the same constitution that enabled them to reach power to their own convenience and ambition.
Easy with the "I'm-not-a-racist," Quasimodo! The more you defend yourself, the more you dig your hole. Just laugh it off.
Personally, I don't think you're racist. Ignorant, yes. But not racist.
;-)
The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina
"Easy with the "I'm-not-a-racist," Quasimodo! The more you defend yourself, the more you dig your hole. Just laugh it off."
I prefer to link it for use as a platform to make the case for Obama over McCain for president. So much is at stake in the coming election that every opportunity must be seized to set forth the facts why Obama should get even Republicans' support. Note two sentences dispensed with it but the balance showed how the world perceives Obama as a ready-for-prime time, world leader. McCain, he is disregarded as more of the same old same old Bush.
Actually E-G, I'd be glad to hear what you have on why Obama is the better candidate. To be honest, I'm still undecided on this one. I've heard about Mr. McCain for over 25 years as a result of his character as a POW. i've also been impressed with his willingness to oppose Mr. Bush on numerous occasions such as where to draw the line on interrogation techniques. I've heard plenty of objections to Obama which I determined to be based on lies and half-truths. If you have valid speaking points, I'm all ears.
Actually Evo said it twice yesterday. Here's the link. And don't anyone tell me that they've taken his words out of context (i.e., E.G.), I saw the video. It was on all the news reports last night.
http://www.finanzas.com/noticias/empresas/2008-07-29/29013_morales-admite-pasos-ilegales-bolivia.html
http://www.diariolasamericas.com/news.php?nid=58039
Sorry for all the Spanish, but here's a comment from Harold Olmos' blog.
La lengua es el castigo del cuerpo - III
Del presidente Evo Morales, hoy, ante una concentración de sus seguidores:
“Yo he aprendido que, por encima de lo legal, está lo politico. Por eso, cuando mis asesores me dicen ‘Evo, lo que estás haciendo es ilegal’, yo les digo: ’si es ilegal, háganlo legal. Para eso han estudiado…”
-0-
Un abogado, con tránsito en escritorios nacionales y extranjeros, me llamó para recordarme en que el campo legal la declaración equivale a ¨confesión de parte, relevo de prueba¨ y que cualquier fiscal podrá, de ahora en adelante, iniciar un juicio de responsabilidades contra el presidente. La presunción sería que muchos de los actos presidenciales fueron ilegales, incluso la convocatoria a referéndum revocatorio, las destituciones de magistrados, las nacionalizaciones, fueron ilegales, pero que sus asesores se encargaron otorgarles vida legal, por lo menos en apariencia. Algo como ¨yo cometo un delito, y Uds. hacen que no parezca delito¨.
La frase se inscribe en otras gravemente célebres dichas por otros presidentes. Como aquella de hace 30 años, ante dirigentes campesinos: ¨A los comunistas, yo los autorizo, mátenlos…¨
Evo, for the 100th time, takes another page from the Bush II playbook and has his Alberto Gonzales episode.
May be grindio can refresh my memory, but it appears that Bush had more integrity on this one because he wanted the memos before acting, wheares Evo acts and then he is asking lawyers to draft memos.
Nevertheless, this is a non-issue. In Bolivia, the last thing that is to be respected is the rule of law.
Norman, your comment requests information that I accept as being a sincere request and is taken at face value after providing some context:
I am embarrassingly entertained by the plethora of imbecilic political graffiti on this blog. Skimming it is like viewing a freeway accident for most comments are ill-informed superficial conclusions or ad hominem attacks that are poorly written and unimaginative.
When I try not to engage on that level and try to inform this community the incoming idiotic missives show they come from uneducated minds with incredible lack of reasoning ability or reading comprehension ability, while being laced with immature emotional responses filled with ignorance and hate. All in service of the deception that perpetuates or exacerbates the harms in Bolivian society (and in the US). (The personal attacks do not bother me just like my vitriolic responses should harm anyone since this is an anonymous comment section. However, I should probably apologize for my occasional embarrassing boasts.) At the Democratic convention in Los Angeles, I realized Democrat and Republican politicians are engaged in subterfuge that seeks not to serve the US but mainly to ensure their continued survival as a business. On significant issues that can bring real change like Evo is trying-so incompetently-to effect, no matter which party controls which branch of government, the differences between them are insignificant.
This election though is different since Bush destroyed 1) the US as the unipolar hegemon; and 2) the Republican party, McCain would be overkill. Thus, it is Obama as the lesser of two evils.
Trying to be objective, let me present your Republican candidate in his own moving images and own statements-or lack thereof-on that key test which should interest you, The Commander in Chief Test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgF39TRCPPE&eurl=http://bruinzone.com/gen/messages/35636.shtml
"This blog is for those who speak the language of Shakespeare, please!"
Hey crooked ;-), are you sure? I bet you don't know what the following Shakespearean line means?
"To thine own self be true; and it must follow, as the night the day, thou can'st not then be false to
any man." Hamlet, Act i, Sc.3
Crooked ;-)said about a commenter,
"Personally, I don't think you're racist. Ignorant, yes. But not racist."
Little Crooked, I think you are a racist and an ignorant.
Franco
“Yo he aprendido que, por encima de lo legal, está lo politico. Por eso, cuando mis asesores me dicen ‘Evo, lo que estás haciendo es ilegal’, yo les digo: ’si es ilegal, háganlo legal. Para eso han estudiado…”
The above is almost a direct translation of what his imperial majesty Dubya could have said to his lackey, AKA Former Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez.
Thanks to Gonzalez's "training" habeas corpus, a right guaranteed by the constution, has been taken away from the US citizenry.
As a side comment, Evo is not taking people's rights. His reforms are hampered by speudo legalities, such as the 'contract for life' given to a company which handles retirement funds in Bolivia. Said contract was of course sanctioned by that prince of free trade-Goni.
Franco
Norman, thank you for the excellent translation of our Andean Mussolini’s epiphany regarding the meaning of the law.
Grindio,
1) Good! You followed my advice and limited your last comments to the usual hateful, racist, fascist and anti democratic themes. Your views on the economy are comparable to those of a retarded bungler!
2) The demeaning manner in which you refer or characterize the Latin American countries is pathetic. .. "Nor is it racist to state that if one has to choose between Paris and Mexico's DF, Paris wins the contest every time"… I find it extremely troubling that a bolivian of Indian origin (I presume) despises great people like the colombians or mexicans just because you now have acquired a blue passport and you are not one of “them” anymore.
3)I , for once, agree with you 100
%. Morales is an incompetent. ..."On significant issues that can bring real change like Evo is trying-so incompetently-to effect, "...
The only and repetive argument used by the fascists of this blog to defend their Andean Mussolini's constant attacks on the crumbling Bolivian democracy is that Mr Bush did this and Mr. Bush did that. You are all pathetic. If you truly believe in this "change" then come up with solid arguments and not all this Bush bs. This blog is about Bolivia!
G-g, thanks for the links. It appears that in context, morales' statement is even more damning than you had indicated.
Franco, there is a bit of a tradition here that you seem to be following. When morales says or does something that honestly cannot be defended, the usual defenders shout "but George was even worse". Some things don't change. We now have documented proof that morales will circumvent the law and the Constitution to achieve his goals. (anon 9:27, you beat me to the point!)
E-G, My request is sincere, and thanks for the link. It was humorous but didn't really provide anything useful. Whenever someone spends that much time in front of the cameras answering a limitless spectrum of questions, you ought to be able to come up with a few minutes of sounds bites for and against. It's the whole Teddy Roosevelt quote:
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.” Me, I'm just a critic. If you come up with anything else though, I'm still listening.
Voting for McCain means perpetuating Bush's status quo and possibly remaining in Iraq for 100 years which is bad considering:
We were told breathless tales of diminutive Jessica Lynch playing some heroic role in an Iraq battle. Only to be taken captive by insurgent Al Queda monsters. After a heroic "rescue" they brought Lynch back to the States where she was paraded around as a hero in the promotion for the Iraq war. The truth eventually came out that she was never being held by anyone and was actually rescued by sympathetic Iraqis who took her to an Iraqi hospital. They were nursing her back to health after she was knocked out and injured in an IED explosion. She never even fired a shot, let alone fought any battle.
We were told Pat Tillman was killed by Al Queda insurgents, after firing on them in another supposed heroic battle. At a time when the Iraq was was being pummeled by the American public, they sold Tillmans false story shamelessly. He was actually killed by our own people, and there wasn't any battle at all. Just like Lynch he never even shouldered his weapon. They even burned his uniform as part of the coverup, while at the same time continuing to sell his death as a justification for the war.
Now we have LaVena Johnson a 5'1" Army private who was beaten, shot, set on fire, and even had lye poured into her vagina. This story was impossible to sell as connected to Al Queda since her body was found in the tent of military contractors. However they sure didn't want that fact out. So instead they shamed this poor soldiers family and stained her memory with an impossible ruling that she had committed suicide. Just like Tillman they lied to the family, then destroyed or witheld evidence in the hope the truth wouldn't get out.
From the story in the St. Louis American:
The Army claims the 5’1” African-American soldier from North County died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound with a rifle on July 19, 2005.
Her father, John H. Johnson, Ph.D. of Florissant, said color photos and documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from the military suggest otherwise.
“Our worst fears were substantiated when we started going through information from the Army,” Johnson said.
Since his daughter’s death, Johnson has been searching for answers that align with the evidence in the case. Johnson hopes a congressional body can push for answers beyond the official report.
“The House Armed Services Committee is looking into Private Johnson’s case, but no decisions have been made regarding a formal investigation,” said Lara Battles, press secretary for the committee.
Johnson was the first woman soldier from Missouri killed in Iraq. Questions surrounding her death were brought to the attention of U.S. Rep. Ike Skelton during her parents’ visit in April to Washington D.C., to speak with him and other members of Congress. Skelton spoke with the father and mother, Linda Johnson.
Her father, who previously served in the U.S. Army and worked and retired as a civilian personnel specialist for the Army, said efforts to obtain a CD-ROM of color photos taken by Army investigators were unfruitful until U.S. Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay spoke about the case at the Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch Congressional hearing.
“Clay put them on the spot during the Jessica Lynch hearings, so they sent (the images) to me,” Johnson said, calling the photos “horrible.”
He said the pictures and documents from the incident proved that his daughter had been brutalized - raped, beaten, shot and set on fire.
“Someone poured lye in her vagina to destroy evidence,” her father said. “Her body was dumped in a dirty, filthy contractor’s tent.
“I told my wife I could let it go, but someone would get away with murder and I couldn’t live with myself.”
A key reason Kerry lost because he was deemed a flip-flopper. Under that standard, McCain loses. Links supporting claims:
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops
Jukebox John keeps changing his tune
It’s obvious that the McCain campaign and the RNC have decided to go after Barack Obama as a flip-flopper. What’s equally obvious, though, that Republicans couldn’t have chosen a worse narrative.
McCain & Co. seemed to stumble on this line of attack almost by accident. They’d experimented with a variety of memes in recent months, none of which had any real salience. The right settled on “flip-flopper,” in large part because it’s the closest available, already-written Republican narrative, and in part because McCain staffers haven’t been able to think of anything else.
The irony, of course, is that the McCain campaign couldn’t have picked a more hypocritical line of attack. Below you’ll find a comprehensive list of reversals from the Republican nominee, numbered and organized by category for easier reference.
Remember, McCain recently said, “This election is about trust and trusting people’s word.” Just a few days prior, the McCain campaign admonished Obama for trying to “have it both ways” on issues.
I should note that there’s nothing offensive about a political figure changing his or her mind once in a while. Policy makers come to one conclusion, they gain more information, and then they reach a different conclusion. That is, to be sure, a good thing — it reflects a politician with an open mind and a healthy intellectual curiosity. Better to have a leader who changes his or her mind based on new information than one who stubbornly sticks to outmoded policy positions, regardless of facts or circumstances.
So why do McCain’s flip-flops matter? Because all available evidence suggests his reversals aren’t sincere, they’re cynically calculated for political gain. This isn’t indicative of an open mind; it’s actually indicative of a character flaw. And given the premise of McCain’s presidential campaign, it’s an area in desperate need of scrutiny.
The perception people have of McCain is outdated, reflective of a man who no longer has any use for his previous persona. What’s wrong with a politician who changes his or her views? Nothing in particular, but when a politician changes his views so much that he has an entirely different worldview, is it unreasonable to wonder whether it’s entirely sincere? Especially when there’s no other apparent explanation for five dozen significant reversals?
McCain has been in Congress for more than a quarter-century; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies. But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned literally dozens of positions he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops — though that’s part of it — it’s more about the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops. That the media still perceives McCain as some kind of “straight talker” who refuses to sway with the political winds makes this all the more glaring.
Here’s the list.
National Security Policy
1. McCain thought Bush’s warrantless-wiretap program circumvented the law; now he believes the opposite.
2. McCain insisted that everyone, even “terrible killers,” “the worst kind of scum of humanity,” and detainees at Guantanamo Bay, “deserve to have some adjudication of their cases,” even if that means “releasing some of them.” McCain now believes the opposite.
3. He opposed indefinite detention of terrorist suspects. When the Supreme Court reached the same conclusion, he called it “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country.”
4. In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.
5. McCain was for closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay before he was against it.
6. When Barack Obama talked about going after terrorists in Pakistani mountains with predators, McCain criticized him for it. He’s since come to the opposite conclusion.
Foreign Policy
7. McCain was for kicking Russia out of the G8 before he was against it. Now, he’s for it again.
8. McCain supported moving “towards normalization of relations” with Cuba. Now he believes the opposite.
9. McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Hamas. Now he believes the opposite.
10. McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Syria. Now he believes the opposite.
11. McCain is both for and against a “rogue state rollback” as a focus of his foreign policy vision.
12. McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.
13. McCain was against divestment from South Africa before he was for it.
Military Policy
14. McCain recently claimed that he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”
15. McCain has changed his mind about a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq on multiple occasions, concluding, on multiple occasions, that a Korea-like presence is both a good and a bad idea.
16. McCain was against additional U.S. forces in Afghanistan before he was for it.
17. McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”
18. McCain has repeatedly said it’s a dangerous mistake to tell the “enemy” when U.S. troops would be out of Iraq. In May, McCain announced that most American troops would be home from Iraq by 2013.
19. McCain was against expanding the GI Bill before he was for it.
20. McCain staunchly opposed Obama’s Iraq withdrawal timetable, and even blasted Mitt Romney for having referenced the word during the GOP primaries. In July, after Iraqi officials endorsed Obama’s policy, McCain said a 16-month calendar sounds like “a pretty good timetable.”
Domestic Policy
21. McCain defended “privatizing” Social Security. Now he says he’s against privatization (though he actually still supports it.)
22. On Social Security, McCain said he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Soon after, asked about a possible increase in the payroll tax, McCain said there’s “nothing that’s off the table.”
23. McCain wanted to change the Republican Party platform to protect abortion rights in cases of rape and incest. Now he doesn’t.
24. McCain supported storing spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Now he believes the opposite.
25. He argued the NRA should not have a role in the Republican Party’s policy making. Now he believes the opposite.
26. In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.
27. McCain is both for and against earmarks for Arizona.
28. McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.
29. McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.
30. McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.
31. McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.
32. McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.
33. In 2005, McCain endorsed intelligent design creationism, a year later he said the opposite, and a few months after that, he was both for and against creationism at the same time.
34. And on gay adoption, McCain initially said he’d rather let orphans go without families, then his campaign reversed course, and soon after, McCain reversed back.
35. In the Senate, McCain opposed a variety of measures on equal pay for women, and endorsed the Supreme Court’s Ledbetter decision. In July, however, McCain said, “I’m committed to making sure that there’s equal pay for equal work. That … is my record and you can count on it.”
36. McCain was against fully funding the No Child Left Behind Act before he was for it.
37. McCain was for affirmative action before he was against it.
Economic Policy
38. McCain was against Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy before he was for them.
39. John McCain initially argued that economics is not an area of expertise for him, saying, “I’m going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues; I still need to be educated,” and “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should.” He now falsely denies ever having made these remarks and insists that he has a “very strong” understanding of economics.
40. McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal. And soon after that, McCain abandoned his second position and went back to his first.
41. McCain said in 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and falsely argued that he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.
42. McCain thought the estate tax was perfectly fair. Now he believes the opposite.
43. McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”
44. McCain has changed his entire economic worldview on multiple occasions.
45. McCain believes Americans are both better and worse off economically than they were before Bush took office.
Energy Policy
46. McCain supported the moratorium on coastal drilling ; now he’s against it.
47. McCain recently announced his strong opposition to a windfall-tax on oil company profits. Three weeks earlier, he was perfectly comfortable with the idea.
48. McCain endorsed a cap-and-trade policy with a mandatory emissions cap. In mid-June, McCain announced he wants the caps to voluntary.
49. McCain explained his belief that a temporary suspension of the federal gas tax would provide an immediate economic stimulus. Shortly thereafter, he argued the exact opposite.
50. McCain supported the Lieberman/Warner legislation to combat global warming. Now he doesn’t.
51. McCain was for national auto emissions standards before he was against them.
Immigration Policy
52. McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. In 2007, he announced his opposition to the bill. In 2008, McCain switched back.
53. On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own bill.
54. In April, McCain promised voters that he would secure the borders “before proceeding to other reform measures.” Two months later, he abandoned his public pledge, pretended that he’d never made the promise in the first place, and vowed that a comprehensive immigration reform policy has always been, and would always be, his “top priority.”
Judicial Policy and the Rule of Law
55. McCain said he would “not impose a litmus test on any nominee.” He used to promise the opposite.
56. McCain’s position was that the telecoms should be forced to explain their role in the administration’s warrantless surveillance program as a condition for retroactive immunity. He used to believe the opposite.
57. McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.
58 In June, McCain rejected the idea of a trial for Osama bin Laden, and thought Obama’s reference to Nuremberg was a misread of history. A month later, McCain argued the exact opposite position.
Campaign, Ethics, and Lobbying Reform
59. McCain supported his own lobbying-reform legislation from 1997. Now he doesn’t.
60. In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.
61. McCain supported a campaign-finance bill, which bore his name, on strengthening the public-financing system. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.
62. In May 2008, McCain approved a ban on lobbyists working for his campaign. In July 2008, his campaign reversed course and said lobbyists could work for his campaign.
Politics and Associations
63. McCain wanted political support from radical televangelist John Hagee. Now he doesn’t. (He also believes his endorsement from Hagee was both a good and bad idea.)
64. McCain wanted political support from radical televangelist Rod Parsley. Now he doesn’t.
65. McCain says he considered and did not consider joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.
66. McCain is both for and against attacking Barack Obama over his former pastor at his former church.
67. McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.
68. In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.
69. McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
70. McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.’” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.
71. McCain believed powerful right-wing activist/lobbyist Grover Norquist was “corrupt, a shill for dictators, and (with just a dose of sarcasm) Jack Abramoff’s gay lover.” McCain now considers Norquist a key political ally.
72. McCain was for presidential candidates giving speeches in foreign countries before he was against it.
Norman and US expatriates who live or do business in or with Bolivia or Latin America do well to vote for Obama based on the differences between his thoughtful position paper regarding Latin America (linked below) and McCain's (he doesn't have one which says volumes of his lack of capacity for presidential governance):
McCain's position paper (insert sound of crickets chirping here): _________________________;
Obama's position paper (get cup of coffee, first before starting this 13 pager): http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/Fact_Sheet_Latin_America_FINAL_060608_IH.pdf
Prefect Paredes of La Paz, a ‘law abiding’ citizen of Bolivia, is on the hot seat for an account of a million plus dollars in the Banco Bilbao Viscaya Argentaria of Spain. According to the prefect this money belongs to a foundation benefitting the residents of La Paz. The good prefect also stated his wife figures as the owner of the account because she “runs the foundation”.
I guess his 22 year old son José Luis Paredes Sánchez, “who recently made a deposit of eight hundred thousand dollars to the account”, is the office gopher.
http://www.laprensa.com.bo/noticias/31-07-08/31_07_08_alfi1.php
Franco
I like the mention of Tapacari. Has anyone been out to Aramasi recently?
Oye amigo, you speak about a supposed "Calle Americas, a central strip in the city’s affluent northern neighborhoods." There is no such calle. There is an avenida America, but no calle Americas. Just want to keep you on the ball.