Forgetting to Buy Beer, and Other More Serious Observations on Bolivia's Election
[A note to readers: This Sunday as Bolivia votes The Democracy Center will be blogging in real time from locations around the country. We also invite all our readers in Bolivia to use the Blog comments section as a space to add their own reporting and commentary, and links to other sources, as the day progresses. So watch this space starting Sunday morning for the latest news and analysis on Bolivia's vote.]It was the one task I ended up with after we divided up assignments for Sunday, and I screwed it up. Buy beer. It wasn't a hard thing to do. Just a few cold ones to have on hand here in the office Sunday for people who might come by while we're busy reporting.
But I missed the deadline.
By law in Bolivia, for 48 hours before an election, it is illegal to buy, sell or consume alcoholic beverages. Really, if you go to one of the big liquor or grocery stores here in Cochabamba you will find a giant yellow ribbon – the kind used elsewhere to mark off road accidents – stretched across the usually active shelves of wine and beer. Those are the official rules, at least.
But the real story is this. On Sunday millions of Bolivians will essentially be confined to their neighborhoods – driving is also prohibited. Left with nothing to do but pass the day with friends and family, you can be quite sure that those cold bottles of Taquiña, Paceña, Huari, and Sureña will not be left capped. The day will not be dry. The big winner on Sunday will not be Evo or the opposition but beer consumption.
And here is where the policy of "don't drink and vote" provides a useful metaphor for Bolivian politics as a whole. On one hand there are the official rules, and then there are the way things really are. If you want to understand Bolivia, it is important to sort out the difference.
A Nation Divided
Reporters have been calling all week with the same question – What will be the outcome of Sunday's vote? What the numbers will be I can't say. Several recent polls have shown Evo riding to a strong victory, surpassing easily his 54% vote in 2005. I still haven’t heard from anyone, however, a solid answer to one key question: Where will Evo and Alvaro get the thousands of new votes they need to compensate for their likely loss of support in places like Sucre? Supposedly Evo's natural base among the rural poor will come out Sunday in greater numbers and with greater pro-MAS enthusiasm than it did in 2005. Maybe so.
It is also true that for people to vote against Evo they have to have some sense that the alternative is more attractive. And if there is one thing that the opposition here has certainly managed to do in recent months, it is to make themselves look really unattractive.
Nevertheless, even if Evo does win officially on Sunday, the real results – like the real consumption of beer – will be something different. There is a reasonable chance that we will wake up Monday morning in a country where a majority of the voters support the President, but where he can't set foot safely in five of the nine nation's departments (states). He sure wasn't able to this week; enough to cancel a planned visit here by the Presidents of Argentina and Venezuela.
Win or lose, Evo seems to have settled in as the revered leader of half the country, and the devil in disguise for the other half. That presents a real problem for governing.
Evo the Ink Blot
Okay, lets be clear. There are certainly very important policy differences between the right and the left in Bolivia, and between MAS backers and MAS adversaries. One side wants to give chunks of land to the landless, the other does not. One side wants regions instead of the nation to control natural resources, the other does not. One side wants to insert the government deeper into the economy, the other does not.
But as I talk to people in Bolivia about Evo and Bolivian politics – and I talk to lots of people, all kinds – it isn't policy I hear about, it's something else. What I hear mostly is a raw reaction, pro and con, to Evo as Ink Blot.
The people who live out where I live in rural Tiquipaya support Evo with gusto. My daughter's young kindergarten teacher is campaigning for him. The wrinkled man who drove me home from the town plaza late last night speaks of Evo like he is his nephew. My neighbor with the braided hair, who takes a switch to the backside of her slow-moving cow, will be one of the first in line Sunday to vote to keep him in office. And they are for Evo for reasons far more powerful than policy. They are for him because they see in him, for the first time in their lives, a President who shares their humble background and who is genuinely dedicated to lifting up their lives.
Similarly, when you get anti-Evo partisans from the middle class to really let fly with their criticism, here as well it isn't policy that you hear about. It's fear. "He is going to take our homes." "He wants us to become just like Cuba." "He has no respect for professionals."
No matter that Evo has repeated a dozen times, including last weekend, that his government respects private property and he has never come close to seizing someone's house. No matter that his so-called gas "nationalization" policies are really just contract renegotiations with foreign oil firms. The fear, mistrust, and the rumors remain.
There is a reason for this. While Evo campaigned in 2005 pledging to be "the President of all Bolivians", for two and a half years he has done nothing substantial, in word or deed, to assure the middle class that he means it. Change, particularly the deep change underway in Bolivia, makes people very nervous. They need their leaders to reassure them not frighten them. Evo has not reassured Bolivia's middle class (a status that in other places would be called the working poor) that he cares and understands their struggles and dreams as well as he understands those of the most impoverished.
If you don't think attending to the needs of the middle class is important for its own sake, then consider its importance politically. If Bolivian politics really is a blood fight between "right and left" then the only certain way to keep the right from swinging back into power is to deny it the one thing it must have to survive – middle class support.
Which brings us to those rebellious departments in the east.
Looking Beyond the Stereotypes
It is not only Bolivians who have made Evo an ink blot upon which to project their deepest hopes and fears. A fair number of analysts from abroad have done so as well.
Mary Anastasia O'Grady of the Wall Street Journal has made a virtual career making whacko off-the-wall declarations about Evo as Lucifer, as have other right-wing columnists. But the left as well has been overly romantic at times in its pro-Evo analysis of all things Bolivian. The typical left analysis goes like this:
On one side is the impoverished indigenous majority and on the other a mostly white elite fighting to keep tight control over the nation's wealth and using control of the media to provoke public opposition to Morales.
To be certain, there is some truth in that analysis. Evo is trying to redistribute power and wealth to those who have long been blocked from both. And a whiter and wealthier elite threatened by that shift in power is the nuclear core of the opposition. But when you actually live here day to day you hear other things that don't fit the mold and make it clear that the story is not quite so simple.
A few months ago in Santa Cruz I had a political chat with a woman who sells chewing gum from a small kiosk. She told me – We don’t want our money to go to La Paz and get eaten up by the bureaucracy and corruption, we want to keep it here. Are we really supposed to conclude that she has simply been brainwashed by the media against her class interest? Is her point not a reasonable one? Anyone who downplays complaints about Bolivian government bureaucracy has never dealt with one. Trust me.
Then there is that taxi driver in Sucre a week ago. He was definitely not white or wealthy but he's driving around with an anti-Evo sticker on his car. He shared with me his anger that Morales and MAS never took seriously the city's desire to have some portion of the national government returned to it from La Paz. Are we to believe that he has merely been paid to say those things by someone with a bigger agenda?
Or here in Cochabamba. What shall we make of the young mother squished next to me in a rusted Toyota taxi-trufi, headed home wearily from a 12 hour day at work. "Evo, he just fights with everyone." Where does she fit into the neat analysis of "Evo vs. the Elites?"
These are real opinions and I hear them expressed here everyday. Bolivian politics, including the politics of Evo, is a good deal more complex than many analysts and activists, left and right, would care to admit.
What to Watch for Now
Certainly the first thing to watch next is the voting and the results Sunday. Will there be conflict during the voting? Maybe in scattered parts, in Santa Cruz for example, where strong partisans on both sides come into proximity to one another. But I think mostly the vote will be peaceful.
As the results come in Sunday evening, here's what we'll be watching for:
The Evo Results and the Reactions
Will Evo win and if so will it be by a clear majority or by the something shy of a majority that still keeps him in office under the complicated rules? Win or lose, will his message to the country be combative or conciliatory? Will his next move be an olive branch or a verbal assault on those who oppose him?
How will the opposition react to the Evo outcome, up or down? Will it send peace signals if Evo wins or declare that he is, in effect, no longer President of half the nation?
Cochabamba
What happens to Manfred Reyes Villa, the embattled governor here? He is the only one among the eight governors on the ballot who has declared that he will not accept the outcome of the vote. He also declared that since the vote is illegitimate that he would not campaign, but appears to be hedging his bet. On my taxi-trufi ride into town this morning I picked up a sky blue 'Vote for Manfred' brochure that features color photos of 16 public work projects he takes credit for.
Does Manfred, if he loses, declare to the press Sunday night that he is still Governor? If he does, on Monday or Tuesday do cocaleros and other core MAS-backers seek to seize physical control of the Cochabamba Prefectura (state office)? If they do, will Manfred's backers take to the streets again as well? Once again, if there is going to be serious conflict in the aftermath of the Sunday vote, the most likely place is here in Cochabamba. But here is an update. Manfred announced today, apparently, that win or lose he'll leave his post to launch a campaign for the Presidency, trying to position himself in the center between Evo and the opposition. That would be a neat fete of political contortionism. Don't bet on it.
The Other Governor Votes
In the other 'Prefecto' votes, what happens if any of them win by a simple majority but fall short of the 'extra-majority' they are required to win under the complicated rules approved by Congress? Will the rules of what it takes to win or lose start to shift?
That Proposed New Constitution
Sunday's vote is in many ways a warm-up match for the real battle ahead, a national vote on MAS' proposed new constitution. If Evo loses the new constitution will be dead, roughly in the manner of a squashed bug. Morales and MAS will have to use all the political capital they have left to try to hold onto the Presidency in the new elections that will be triggered in 3 to 6 months. If Evo wins, and especially if he wins big, MAS will use that momentum to begin the campaign for the new constitution immediately.
And forget all the talk that will take place around issues like autonomy, etc. The real fight will be over Presidential re-election. Without a new constitution Evo can't run again in 2010 and MAS doesn't have anyone else that can compete. The opposition only has to be patient two and a half more years and to fight among themselves over who takes the Presidency. But under the new constitution written by MAS Evo can run again in 2010 and will, and the opposition has no one who can beat him, not now.
Okay, getting back to that beer metaphor, the one about the difference between the official rules and the actual ones. That is the weakness of Bolivian politics at the moment. A game with high stakes is being played but no one is sure what the rules really are, what each side will accept. Most people here that I talk with hope that whatever the outcome that Bolivia will not blow itself apart. That would be a good start.
And by the way, another member of The Democracy Center team just reported that beer is still for sale at the small market around the corner. So I guess I still don't understand the official rules here, or the unofficial ones either.
52 Comments:
I am trying to figure out the alcohol thing, too. The bistro down the street is serving wine, but the Hipermaxi as it all blocked off.
Grumble.
I was in Mexico City in 2006 and I thought it was ridiculous that alcohol was forbidden on Election Day..... But the entire weekend?!
Ouch.
m-grace@blogspot.com
Oh, I'm in La Paz, BTW.
I have family in La Paz
I have heard nothing from them
I am wondering what is the situation there? Is in unstable
is it safe for tourists to be out?
Is it safe at all?
Things are pretty quiet in LP right now. The tourists are struggling with the concept of a Friday night without alcohol, but they're still out and about. BTW, I bought some beer this evening at a little store in Alto San Pedro. No dice at Ketal or Hipermaxi.
All of this talk of cerveza is making me thirsty...
I would just like to point out that the banning of alcoholic beverages in the States would be the direct cause of riots and uproar. In fact when the police tried to put an end to the Mardi Gras celebration in SLO, CA, the resistant youth were attacked with rubber bullets as they attempted to party in the streets. However, I suppose the priorities of Bolivia's populace are quite different than many US college students...or even many US citizens. I find it remarkable that a country places enough value on the democratic process to essentially 'close' down. My soccer league will not even play on Sunday.
The way I see it, regardless of the results, Bolivia has succeeded in stirring up the dialog. Now if only all this excitement and emotion could be directed toward some unification process. However, I honestly don't buy the 'nation divided' slogan. Once you start passing la chicha or discussing la papa, people gather as one with their motherland.
Some responses to your Evo "ink blot" observations.
"They need their leaders to reassure them not frighten them. Evo has not reassured Bolivia's middle class (a status that in other places would be called the working poor) that he cares and understands their struggles and dreams as well as he understands those of the most impoverished."
Wait, I thought you said Evo constantly reassures everyone he respects private property. What is Evo suppose to do Jim to reassure these people? Linera is on the TV constantly explaining in reasoned and nonoffensive language what they are trying to do and how it doesn't trample on middle class feet. Jim, you need to accept that behind those middle class fears is something very simple. Racism. Evo is the first president not to look like Bolivia's privileged professional class and it scares them. Look at what is being done to Obama in the US press and he isn't even calling for some kind of revolution. Face it Jim. Racism, Racism, Racism.
"A few months ago in Santa Cruz I had a political chat with a woman who sells chewing gum from a small kiosk. She told me – We don’t want our money to go to La Paz and get eaten up by the bureaucracy and corruption, we want to keep it here. Are we really supposed to conclude that she has simply been brainwashed by the media against her class interest? Is her point not a reasonable one?"
She is "brainwashed" or loaded full of propoganda and her point is not reasonable because Evo has dolled out natural gas revenues back to departmental governments. Go see this analysis:
http://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2008/07/mo-money-evo-or-morales-hands-out-gas.html
"Then there is that taxi driver in Sucre a week ago. He was definitely not white or wealthy but he's driving around with an anti-Evo sticker on his car. He shared with me his anger that Morales and MAS never took seriously the city's desire to have some portion of the national government returned to it from La Paz."
Recognition of Sucre as the historic capital? site of the "fourth power" Electoral Organ? Proposal to convoke Congressional sessions, and Presidential inaugurations? This was all proposed to the Inter-institutional Committee and rejected by that band of criminals before they let their thugs loose on the constituyentes.
So actually that leftist analysis of "white elite fighting to keep tight control over the nation's wealth and using control of the media to provoke public opposition to Morales." sounds fairly accurate and effective.
A little research wouldn't hurt Jim.
Good post Jim. As you say, the situation is very complex and can't be confined to the simplistic rich against poor, right against left, white against indians, etc. dichotomies. The reality is that no matter what happens tomorrow, the two positions are virtually irreconcilable. Evo could have done wonders for Bolivia but instead of following the steps of Mandela, he chose to impose a totalitarian regime to all Bolivians. Bolivia desperately needs a third way, one that by no means returns to the putrid old politics but at the same time lays the foundation for a true revaluation of the poor by creating the economic, social and legal bases which allow all the people, but especially the poor, to obtain education, jobs and opportunities. From now on the poor will not accept a government that doesn’t give a priority to their aspirations and the provinces will not accept a gov. that takes the funds from them to centralize the power in La Paz.
Hey anon 12:27 "..."Look at what is being done to Obama in the US press and he isn't even calling for some kind of revolution"...
Are you kidding me! Obama has had an OVERWHELMING support from the "main media" in the primary campaign against Hillary and now against McCain. I think a little research wouldn't hurt YOU buddie!
La Paz seems chill so far. I'll be walking around and observing later today. Check for updates at m-grace.blogspot.com.
Beer, wine, rum and vodka are available and on sale at any local tienda here in Cochabamba. There are no laws, rather, only 'guidelines'.
"Are you kidding me! Obama has had an OVERWHELMING support from the "main media" in the primary campaign against Hillary and now against McCain. I think a little research wouldn't hurt YOU buddie!"
Any of these strike a bell. "Terrorist Fist Bump", New Yorker cover, Rev Wright "is anti-american, a racist", "Obama=Osama", Barack "HUSSIAN" Obama. Go check out the Daily Show's "baraknaphobia" series.
Besides, Anon 12.35, you haven't address the actual points Anon 12.17 was making with regards to Jim's at best cursory analysis.
Evo's motto...
....."I've learned that, above what is legal, there is politics. Given that, when my advisors tell me 'Evo, what you are doing is illegal', I just go ahead and do it and tell them: 'if it isn't legal, make it legal. That's why you studied..." ... Evo Morales
IRONY ALERT!!!!
FACTS:
In a well reasoned comment based on empirically derived research and urging readers to personally witness if the following is not a fact, Anon12:27 ACCURATELY observed: "Look at what is being done to Obama in the US press and he isn't even calling for some kind of revolution"...
WILD UNSUPPORTED CLAIM/REPUBLICAN SPEAKING POINTS:
IRONICALLY Anon 12:35PM wildly claimed: 'Obama has had an OVERWHELMING support from the "main media" in the primary campaign against Hillary and now against McCain. I think a little research wouldn't hurt YOU buddie!'
RESEARCH-BASED FACTS:
Pulitzer prize winning LA Times informed us about wild claims that spread deceptive negative stereotypes like Anon 12:35Pm's:
In study, evidence of liberal-bias bias, Cable talking heads accuse broadcast networks of liberal bias -- but a think tank finds that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Barack Obama than on John McCain in recent weeks.
By James Rainey, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 27, 2008
..."Such pronouncements, sorry to say, tend to be wrong since they describe a monolithic media that no longer exists. Information today cascades from countless outlets and channels, from the Huffington Post to Politico.com to CBS News and beyond.
But now there's additional evidence that casts doubt on the bias claims aimed -- with particular venom -- at three broadcast networks.
The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University, where researchers have tracked network news content for two decades, found that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Obama than on Republican John McCain during the first six weeks of the general-election campaign.
You read it right: tougher on the Democrat.
During the evening news, the majority of statements from reporters and anchors on all three networks are neutral, the center found. And when network news people ventured opinions in recent weeks, 28% of the statements were positive for Obama and 72% negative.
Network reporting also tilted against McCain, but far less dramatically, with 43% of the statements positive and 57% negative, according to the Washington-based media center."
ARGUMENT:
In at best, a case of the kettle calling the pot "Black"-Anon 12:35 infected this blog with the worst virus: Republican deception & disinformation that promotes negative stereotypes as evidenced above. Anon 12:27 truthfully told us what he observed and his reasonable conclusion that has been factually supported above.
Clearly the dimwitted,Machavelians from Mayberry, having received their US Mission civil service jobs as political spoils (documented as unlawful discriminatory political appointments throughout the Bush government), are working overtime to intervene in Bolivia to defeat democracy and install a Bush-like coup de etat (See Gore v Bush decision by US Supreme Court that effectively installed the popular vote loser Bush as president) while at the same time keeping Bush Cheney from being sent to the Hague if Obama is elected and the rule of law returns to US governance.
PS Rogue CIA agents/US Mission dunces, do not violate any international or US federal or state laws by seeking to chill my US 1st Amendment right of free speech by way of violent threats. ALL legal remedies will be pursued vigorously.
Why don't you ask Hillary if the "main media" was not ruling for Obama. ;)
Hey El Grindio,
I've been following our posts for some time on Jim's blog and agree with pretty much everything you have to say. I know you live in the LA area and I recently moved out there with my wife and would like to meet up with you some time to get some further incite from you regarding the issues in Bolivia now. Just a little background, I lived and worked in Sucre back in 2002 and fell in love with the country and hold it dear to my heart. I hear what you say about Croats like Markinovic destroying the country and pressing separatism as I am of Serbian decent and saw what these separatists did to my parent's country with all of their lies and propaganda. I fear that the same will happen in Bolivia.
If you want to meet up please e-mail me at toddsucre@live.com and we can exchange more information.
Hermanos y Hermanas Bolivianas:
No soy Masista. Soy Boliviano que vive en EEUU desde niño; Amo la tierra que me vio nacer. Estoy re-integrando a mi país para poner el famoso granito de arena y tengo esta observación:
Según los hechos (como super avit tres anos seguidos, reparticion de la riquesa natural con el pueblo y no para uso como banco privado de ciertas familias de la sociedad/suciedad) y lo que dice en contexto:
el presidente Morales debe ser confirmado para segir mejorando Bolivia, pero de manera que ayuda a todas las clases. Eso se puede coregir.
Los que abogan a sacar al "indio de m..." del poder están usando tacticas Republicanas, copiado de la campana de Bush, para metir a Bolivia en un crisis que permite que de nuevo nos controlan. Hoy repitieron cierto comentarios del presidente, fuera de contexto y piden que tomas ciertas acciones.
El presidente sabe que es un ignorante (como yo soy, en cuestiones de otorgrafia de Castellano) que no tuvo oportunidades de estudiar, y menos estudiar derechos constitucionales. Estos comentarios humildes del presidente estan ciendo torcidos para pintarlo como un futuro tirano.
En contexto, el presidente muestra que "tomo en serio sus responsabilidades constitucionales". Aquí esta la prueba sobre el punto en cuestión::
'El presidente Evo Morales manifestó este viernes que su Gobierno tomara en cuenta la declaracióne de la Corte
Más adelante, el Mandatario indicó que "no soy abogado, niconstitucionalista" para dar un criterio, "en este momento quedaría mal si (dijera que) algunas resoluciones de la Corte Nacional Electoral tienen mas poder que una ley aprobada en el Congreso Nacional".
En ese entendido, dijo que se estudiará las decisiones adoptadas
por el órgano electoral nacional, junto a siete cortes electorales departamentales, en el marco de la legalidad, la legitimidad y la democracia.'
http://abi.bo/index.php?i=noticias_texto_paleta&j=20080801154815&=200808010005_Morales_hace_declaraciones_en_Palacio_Quemado_(ABI).
We who oppose this fascist regime don't need to present arguments against Morales. He is our best spokesman. The more he speaks, the less we have to do.
Anon 1) "Why don't you ask Hillary if the "main media" was not ruling for Obama. ;)"
Why don't you stay on point. Try writing topical comments. Illuminate our understanding of the CURRENT issues regarding establishing the rule of law within a participatory democracy-despite deceptive tactics like yours that spread negative stereotypes or divert us from our task. Our goal: democracy wherein constitutional rights are respected, equitable relief is granted and justice prevails SOMEDAY SOON in Bolivia and USA.
Catch me later at J-bay yall!
Anon 5:22 pm, let me give you some heads up. To be Grindio’s friend, you need to meet the following criteria.
Be a fascist.
Live in a gated community mansion (must have marble statues).
Be a surfer.
Hate the US.
Hate Bush.
Hate Cheney.
Hate uuummm everything.
Be a “hottie”.
Have lousy grammar (Spanish and English).
You need to suck in economy 101.
Wish you luck in your encounter.
Another Anon wrote: "I hear what you say about Croats like Markinovic destroying the country and pressing separatism as I am of Serbian decent and saw what these separatists did to my parent's country with all of their lies and propaganda. I fear that the same will happen in Bolivia.
If you want to meet up please e-mail me at toddsucre@live.com and we can exchange more information."
Todd, thanks but:
1) my dance card is full.
2) Also, I ran out of applications for friendships sometime after school ended.
3) Nor do I have any better insights to share than the fine job Jim and his staff do on this blog;
4) If I have something to say, I prefer to share them on this forum for the purpose of efficacy regarding informing the community of Bolivia-lovers; and
5) If it is "information" you seek, those who read this blog (collectively) are "your man".
Perhaps you could introduce yourself better by sharing analogies regarding what the US-Croat combo did to your country and how that applies to Bolivia.
In terms of efficacy, the insightful dynamic you seek would be more beneficial to you than just relying on myself and my limited resources: negative, according to some who comment herein.
Everytime the fascist numbskulls in the US mission post on here as anonymous, it is good for a couple of laughs, at least regarding applying for membership in that prestigious private club of urban hipsters "Friends of El Grindio":
"Be a fascist."
Deny; see below
"Live in a gated community mansion (must have marble statues)."
Definitely a good intro.
"Be a surfer."
Case by case, since many surfers are home schooled thus would only qualify for a career in Bolivia's US Mission based on their Republican contributions.
"Hate the US."
Deny, hate is limited to the "Dark Side", that is those Republicans within the US government that have put it on the road toward being a third world nation.
"Hate Bush."
check
"Hate Cheney."
check
"Hate uuummm everything."
Qualifier: hate everything evil or Republican which is a redundant term for evil.
'Be a “hottie”.'
Just so happens that upon further review, the quota for "hottie" has not been met thus there are some openings for those members of the under-represented "hottie" community. Any "hottie" interested in applying should email a request to Norman's email address for his review.
"Have lousy grammar (Spanish and English)."
check
"You need to suck in economy 101."
Please keep keep the business activities of your kneepad-clad significant other (VIC or "crooked face" or "Bush is vindicated" or Mr. "Croats are Morales' jews...") out of my family-rated comments.
Anon 5:27 , after reading Grindio's response to you I have to add be an ARROGANT to the heads up list I provided you.
To the Republican nitwitt at the US Mission or is it the Croat member of the UCJ (I always confuse you guys since you both post as "anonymous"), who wrote:
"Anon 5:27 , after reading Grindio's response to you I have to add be an ARROGANT to the heads up list I provided you."
To be your friend, one just has to ask. Only a moronic ignoramus who lacks the necessary interpersonal skills to have friends-like your hate-laden comments show you lack-would fail to understand satire or when someone has their tongue firmly planted in their cheek.
But then you who support torturing people as in Abu Ghraib or Guantamo (or Santa Cruz or Sucre as do the UCJ) are political reactionaries with substandard educations. You are paid to write comments that keep Jim's work in check, not to understand subtext or humor.
But thanks for making this blog all about me. It's not easy being "an ARROGANT".
We "an ARROGANTS", like all adjectives made into nouns or proper nouns by you retard types (in the US Mission and UCJ) need all the attention we can get.
Closing thought:
On your claim that one needs bad grammar in English and Spanish to be my friend, I must confess one thing:
As your leader/paymaster (George W. Bush) might say:
As this blog's writer-in-chief, the worserer the grammar, the betterer.
Bolivianos/as:
Antes de votar, ver esta "intimatrix de una falsa autonomia de ricos que se quiere imponer y hacer creer que es para todos y que pretende divir Bolivia":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8utLCTIoTo&feature=related
"It is also true that for people to vote against Evo they have to have some sense that the alternative is more attractive."
Not true at all, Jim. Most people that will vote to recall Evo just want him out. This is widespread and they haven't thought much about what the consequences to his recall might be. The "voto castigo" is going to be against Evo this time. There is currently no alternative to Evo (actually there is, I'll get to that later), and if he is recalled he'll just have to leave office and Bolivia will continue on with its campaign culture which hasn't stopped since Goni's last election. Evo's recall is the best case scenario for the country because it will mean the least amount of violence, although in the wake of an Evo recall, there will be a fair amount originating from Chapare and El Alto, Evo's only power bases at present. Chapare will back down quickly and concentrate on its primary industry while El Alto, which doesn't produce cocaine, will have nothing better to do than continue protesting but that won't last forever.
Evo's recall is the best thing that can happen for the Bolivian people, although the consequences of a recall are not necessarily positive because no one has a real plan for the day after (well, a few people do but I'm getting to that). What is much more dangerous for Bolivians is if Evo is ratified because I see few variants on the following scenario:
Evo, if ratified, will treat the opposition governors, who have won autonomy by referendum and will be ratified tomorrow, with a heavy hand. The opposition governors, with Evo recalled in their departments but themselves ratified, will only intensify the recent protests in the form of airport and other strategic takeovers. By Evo's heavy hand I mean real repression by the police. If ratified tomorrow, Evo must attempt to regain control of the country and this can only be done by force. The police will be called out to perform this task initially and will act brutally. The opposition will place women and children in front of their protests, the police will act anyway and this will provoke armed confrontation between the oppostion and the police. It will only take one opposition bullet to provoke the police to use lethal force. The police will then likely be overwhelmed by the opposition resistence or they will shoot too many civilians to continue. This situation will force the military to intervene (legally the military has to) and the military can do one of two things:
1. Back the police and use continued force. Remember that the military is not for crowd control and only is equipped with lethal weapons. The military will have to kill civilians to suppress the resistance. The police will have already exchanged fire with the civilians before the military steps in, and the police could get caught between the civilians and the military, leading to something similar to "Febrero Negro," where the police and army (who have no love lost between them institutionally) were exchanging fire with each other. In any case, once a significant number of casualties on any side (civilian, police or military) is recorded, the military will force Evo to step down. Or:
2. The same scenario as above but when the military is called upon to back up the police, with "Octubre Negro" still fresh in their minds, they will refuse the order and force Evo to step down.
Now, why would the military force Evo out in the above circumstances? Mostly because Bolivian military officers are good and decent and killing civilians is not part of their doctrine. Also because at least half the country is against Evo and most military officers, who are well educated men, disagree with his policies, cash bonuses to senior officers notwithstanding.
If you follow the above logic, let's consider the timeliness of Manfred's announcement of his presidential candidacy. If Evo is pushed out by the military, this is perfect for him. Most folks know that Manfred was discharged as an army captain many years ago. However, not everyone considers the Bolivian military promotion system; it's based primarily on time served, provided an officer passes advanced training (something Quintana never could do). Anyhow, through some simple math based on Bolivian military promotions (one rank every five years), we can assume that most of Manfred's former comrades/classmates are now General or Flag officers or are active reserve senior officers. Manfred's announcement Friday is no shot in the dark.
Given that Chuquisaca will likely recall Evo as Jim intelligently concludes, that leaves only La Paz, Potosi and Oruro on Evo's side. Those three departments aren't close to half of the country. Unfortunately, though, I predict that Evo will be ratified anyway because he controls the CNE. Any way you slice it, the military is going to get involved, whether it is to put down opposition protests in the wake of an Evo ratification, which will lead to Evo's removal or; to generally maintain order until the next election in the unlikely event of Evo's recall tomorrow. Their comrade Manfred is ready to take the reigns and there is no one else opposed to Evo with a chance of winning an election in the next 6 months. I'm not necessarily a Manfred fan, I just see the odds in his favor.
Hopefully though, Evo's lust for power and his desire to remain in office will be stronger than his urges to counterattack the opposition and Bolivia will return from the brink as it always has. That would be nice, because then we could all keep drinking Bolivian beer and carefreely continue to post on this fine blog.
Anon 10.02
Back to the real world. I am willing to wager heavily against your "predictions".
Lets do ourselves a favor when heading out to drink beer this weekend. Make it a Pacena, Bolivia's #1 beer. mmmmmmmmm
Pacena, es calidad!
http://www.ratebeer.com/beerimages/full_size/13125.jpg
COMMON GROUND ALERT!!!!
EL GRINDIO ADMITS: "I'M WRONG; NORMAN APPEARS TO BE CORRECT"
Another Anon wrote:
"Lets do ourselves a favor when heading out to drink beer this weekend. Make it a Pacena, Bolivia's #1 beer. mmmmmmmmm
Pacena, es calidad!"
The above is what I used to opine. However, after drinking... err.... researching this pressing issue ... err... extensively so as to get to the bottom (of the beer bottle), I conclude that based on Jim and his staff's apparent extensive research and posting of their evidence (the photo above), it appears that Norman was right when he wrote that Huari is probably better than Pacena.
(Norman obviously never abandoned his Marine creed of never leaving behind a full beer bottle.)
"Evo, if ratified, will treat the opposition governors, who have won autonomy by referendum and will be ratified tomorrow, with a heavy hand. The opposition governors, with Evo recalled in their departments but themselves ratified, will only intensify the recent protests in the form of airport and other strategic takeovers."
Anon 10:02,
You sound like.........Goni.
Anyone bought from www.belrion.com before ? heard they are a paypal world seller and are macfee secured. Appreciate some feedback from anyone ^^
buy ffxi
buy eq flat
cheap wow gold
LOTR gold
buy aoc gold
buy L2 adena
buy gils
cheap gold wow
Goni says:
"Most bolivian officers are highly educated men, who will remember October Negro"
Is Reyes Villa educated? He has barely a high school diploma, just like Evo.
His education as a bolivian cadet barely surprases public education of poor high schools.
The difference between Goni, Reyes Villa and Evo?
Only Evo is honest, hard working and tryly bolivian.
El Grindio wrote: Any "hottie" interested in applying should email a request to Norman's email address for his review.
E-G, I knew you had it in for me, but are you trying to get me killed?!? My wife is Latina! Can't we all just try to get along... with a Huari ;-).
Anon 10:46:
"Back to the real world. I am willing to wager heavily against your 'predictions.'"
Do you have any coherent counterargument or do you just disagree? What doesn't make sense? How do you expect Evo to act if he's ratified? What I predict won't happen in a day if Evo is ratified but it will happen if he refuses to recognize that at least half the country is against him and that he needs to have a real dialogue with the opposition. If this conflict stretches on for months or a year, then other opposition candidates besides Manfred will appear. Otherwise, I don't see any other way around things. Today, Manfred could easily hook up with Savina Cuellar as his VP candidate and put together a winning ticket.
To Anon 12:58:
What's Goni-like about my opinion? What do you expect Evo to do if he's ratified? Accept that he and his cabinet can't travel through half of the country?
To Anon 4:59:
Go smoke your purple haze somewhere else. Evo claims to be an indian but doesn't even speak an indigenous language. So much for honesty.
Could you define a "true Bolivian" for me? Is it an Aymara, a Quechua, a Guarani or Marinkovic? Who's more American? Obama, McCain or Richardson? Who's more Peruvian? Garcia or Umala? The answer to all these questions is none of the above. Your statement makes no sense.
I will give Evo credit for being a hard worker and I, as did many others, had high hopes for him that have since diminished entirely. Manfred is just as Bolivian as Evo and perhaps equally educated. I don't know if Manfred studied anywhere other than in the army. Either way, both have plenty of experience that they substitute for education. I wouldn't compare Goni to either one of the other two, he's in a league all his own.
Checkmate. Pacena (the beer) has ALWAYS been utter poison, it's not a recent development.
Marty, thanks for your input. However, my recollection differs from yours. It's based on long ago. Possibly before Max Fernandez bought it or passed away. Before his jerk sons took it over and probably diluted its quality in terms of hops, water amount and quality. (Note: eventually Quilmes, an Argentine company bought it.)
One thing is certain, I was embarrassed to have served it to friends. I had heralded it as something more than what it has become for the Pacenas I had, though not many in number, were great according to my recollection.
Then again, maybe it wasn't the beer Pacenas I am associating good memories with. :-)
No need to get all Agro, there's plenty of waves for everyone bra.
Norman wrote: "E-G, I knew you had it in for me, but are you trying to get me killed?!? My wife is Latina! Can't we all just try to get along... with a Huari ;-)."
Hooo...aaah (cue sound effect of Al Pacino as a Marine in "Scent of a Woman" here)
Norman, business before pleasure; the Huaris can wait (appropriately chilled). As a Republican Marine, you donated sweat, blood and dreams in service of ... Cheney's shares in Haliburton, Exxon, Bechtel... Your Republican creed is "the business of America is business".
Not nation building, or promoting democracy in far off Iraq or even investing in rebuilding the crumbling US infrastructure, not to mention its urban plight or growing underclass.
Now, do something for your country. Man your station in this latest chapter of the Republican global fight against terrorism. As your commander (based on my ownership of the controlling shares of El Grindio International Trading Company), I order you to open up those jpg files attached to the requests for an application for membership in that exclusive club: "Friends of El Grindio". Otherwise, as Bush often says when giving an edict, the terrorists win.
If your Latina wife does not understand you're answering this call of duty to ferret out the true believer hotties from wannabe sleeper-cell hotties, then so be it if you must sacrifice your life in service of transnational corporations...err ...your country.
As to your wife... she wouldn't happen to be a hottie, would she? If so, I promise to immediately process her application since as a widow she will meet the applicable stringent standards established (must be a hottie, single and not dating anyone versed in firearms).
Ps In terms of your respect for the applicable chain of command, tell the Republican National Committee that my political contribution check is in the mail or must have been lost in the mail. I promise (according to the applicable standard: Republican political promises) to make good that political contribution. AFTER you serve this your most recent tour of duty.
To the "Barney" above, you forgot to insert the term "mate" after agro.
Readers, including the anon who kindly provided the Surfer Magazine cite which contained an interview with "Occy" (one of the world's greatest surfers), it seems Occy's still been surfing on the pro circuit and still sponsored by Gordon Merchant (Australian owner/franchisor of Billbong, who started out selling surftrunks out of the trunk of his car).
When I last saw Occy, once was out in the lineup at Pipeline and the other was when he was raging with my other friend Mickey Nielsen and running up a big bar tab (to my benefit). That apparently explains hard-charging (in and out of the water) Occy's looks in said website's photo. If you're going to be in the sun all day, you might want to think twice about drinking much alcohol. It too dries up your skin, but from the inside.
Since I will be taking out my long board (which lends itself more to my stylish approach to surfing smoothly instead of jerkily and also to catching waves earlier and allowing me to run over the likely future Republicans in the line up at Lower Trestles) and surfing again, I will be seeing Occy. I'll be sure to show him this page on my iphone.
Ok Goni, let's just wait and watch what happens... proving you wrong.
Manfred and Cuellar a winning ticket? That's the funniest thing I've read all week. Thanks for the laugh.
Keep sipping pisco in DC, yaking about "narco- terrorism". Enjoy, because justice is coming.
Goni wrote: "Evo claims to be an indian but doesn't even speak an indigenous language. So much for honesty."
Hmmm, if all the Native-Americans in the US do not speak "an indigenous language", then they are dishonest if they say they are Native-Americans?
And the above sample of your pattern of reasoning is why we should believe your predictions will come to pass? Including the one about Manfred (who now cannot even win a majority vote in Cochabamba just as Cuellar could not win in the rural areas of Chuquisaca)?
Yeah, right.
Your ad hominem about smoking "purple haze" appears to be a case of you projecting onto others that which you engage in.
As Grindo takes another line of Cocaine....
I don't care much for pisco, I don't live in DC and never mentioned narcoterrorism but I'll give you an "A" for effort. I know you're sure that Evo will be in power indefinitely but have you considered who might be electable if he leaves office? And what's the justice that's coming? You seem to have all the answers.
Grindio, you took my comment out of context. I was only responding to someone who said that Evo is an honest guy. Maybe my example was a poor one. How about another one, paraphrased from one of Evo's speeches last week: "Bolivia is fine, there are just a few families who are against change." If not dishonest, then that statement is delusional. As far as my reasoning and predictions, how about offerring a counterpoint?
Readers, another anon (Goni) made claims disparaging Bolivia's president on election day by 1) inocculating themselves by claiming to formerly support Evo before bashing Evo; and 2) basing his anti-Evo arguments on himself as an authority (in an evidentiary sense) and his pattern of reasoning that resulted in "predictions".
Before accepting Goni's self-based claims one should test Goni's hypothesis by qualifying him as an authoritative source, thus the following use of bandwidth:
Goni,
Firstly, please provide us context that verifies your argument that regardless of one's (or Evo's) DNA, if one (or Evo) cannot speak the language of his ethnic group then they (or Evo) are dishonest if they (or Evo) claim to be of that ethnicity.
Secondly, since that is not likey possible for anyone, neither were these arguments valid within the context you provided:
Your new claim:
"Grindio, you took my comment out of context. I was only responding to someone who said that Evo is an honest guy."
The following-IN ITS ENTIRETY-is your former claim within its context, as provided by you:
"To Anon 4:59:
Go smoke your purple haze somewhere else. Evo claims to be an indian but doesn't even speak an indigenous language. So much for honesty.
Could you define a "true Bolivian" for me? Is it an Aymara, a Quechua, a Guarani or Marinkovic? Who's more American? Obama, McCain or Richardson? Who's more Peruvian? Garcia or Umala? The answer to all these questions is none of the above. Your statement makes no sense.
I will give Evo credit for being a hard worker and I, as did many others, had high hopes for him that have since diminished entirely. Manfred is just as Bolivian as Evo and perhaps equally educated. I don't know if Manfred studied anywhere other than in the army. Either way, both have plenty of experience that they substitute for education. I wouldn't compare Goni to either one of the other two, he's in a league all his own.
10:36 AM"
After Goldberg returned from USA, he met with camba leaders Branko, Costas etc. Is this the plan he discussed with them so Bolivia may have crisis and become seperate countries the US can control?
60 unionistas están con bates en la zona 1ro de mayo de Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz 10 Ago (ABI).- Jóvenes de la Unión Juvenil Cruceñista y la Federación Universitaria Local_FUL de Santa Cruz aparecieron armados de palos y bates en la zona 1 de mayo del Plan 3000 amedrentando a los pobladores y repartiendo panfletería contraría al presidente Evo Morales.
El grupo de jóvenes se hizo presente en el lugar al promediar las 9:00 y vestidos con poleras de la Unión Juvenil Cruceñista y la Federación Universitaria Local, reparten panfletos contra el gobierno. "No al MAS, antes de la nacionalización no nos faltaba el gas, pero por culpa de Evo hay escasez", dice un texto. "Vota NO por Evo Morales y García Linera y vota SI por Ruben Costas", dice otra inscripción.
El grupo de jóvenes se moviliza en micros y camionetas de la Universidad Gabriel René Moreno de Santa Cruz y realiza rondas en torno a los recintos de votación.
Cuando la policía procedió a decomisar los bates, uno de los representantes de la FUL dijo que "eso era injusto porque sólo estaban controlando que las elecciones se realicen con normalidad".
http://www.abi.bo/index.php?i=noticias_texto_paleta&j=20080810111705&l=200806010013
E-G, I've got 20 years of marriage to a definite hottie. I'm not risking it for pictures of wannabes.
For the general audience... thje weather is absolutely gorgeous in Santa Cruz today. Light winds, sunny, and no disturbances to be heard. I'll have to check the news to see if it's any different in other basrrios, but all's quiet in my neighborhood. And no, Norman didn't vote.
ELECTORL HANKY PANKY in Santa Cruz (where else but?)
Santa Cruz: Desalojan a indígenas de recintos electorales
Santa Cruz, 10 Ago (Erbol).- En las localidades de Santa Rosa de las Rocas, San Rafael, provincia Velasco del Departamento de Santa Cruz, indígenas del pueblo Chiquitano fueron desalojados de los recintos electorales por un personero de la prefectura del departamento y un miembro de la Corte Departamental Electoral.
“Son delegados acreditados ante la Corte Departamental Electoral (CDE), no tienen por qué desalojarlos de este recinto”, señaló la delegada presidencial Gabriela Montaño.
Gabriela Montaño advirtió que en la localidad de San Rafael de la provincia Velasco se está violando el Código Electoral, ya que varias personas votan de manera pública obligadas por los jurados electorales.
“Tienen que marcar la papeleta delante de los jurados electorales”, señaló Montaño.
El presidente de la Corte Departamental Electoral de Santa Cruz, Mario Orlado Parada, informó que de forma inmediata se habilitó el recinto de la localidad de Santa Rosa de las Rocas.
[url=http://www.wow7gold.com/age-of-conan-gold.html]age of conan gold[/url]
[url=http://www.wow7gold.com/age-of-conan-gold.html]buy age of conan gold[/url]
([url=http://www.buy-aoc-gold.org.cn]aoc gold[/url])[url=http://www.wow7gold.com]wow gold[/url][url=http://www.wow7gold.com]world of warcraft gold[/url] ([url=http://www.gold-aoc.org]aoc gold[/url])[url=http://www.wow7gold.com/lord-of-the-rings-online-gold.html]lord of the rings online gold[/url][url=http://www.wow7gold.com/lord-of-the-rings-online-gold.html]lotro gold[/url][url=http://www.buy-warhammer.com/]buy warhammer gold[/url][url=http://www.buy-diablo.com]diablo 3 gold[/url][url=http://www.ignmax.com]games gold[/url][url=http://www.buy-warhammer.com/]warhammer gold[/url][url=http://www.sevengold.com/]buy wow gold [/url][url=http://www.mmoinn.com/]wow gold[/url] [url=www.mmoinn.com/]world of warcraft gold[/url] [url=www.mmoinn.com/]warhammer Powerlevel[/url]
仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架 塑料托盘|栈板 钢托盘|钢制托盘 折叠式仓储笼|仓库笼 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 周转箱|塑料周转箱 托盘|纸托盘 料箱|钢制料箱 工具柜|工具车|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌 刀具柜|刀具车|刀具架 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|手动叉车 仓储笼 仓库笼 南京仓储笼 常州仓储笼 无锡仓储笼 苏州仓储笼 徐州仓储笼 南通仓储笼 镇江仓储笼 连云港仓储笼 泰州仓储笼 扬州仓储笼 盐城仓储笼 淮安仓储笼 宿迁仓储笼 轻量型货架|角钢货架 中量A型货架 中量B型货架 货位式货架 横梁式货架 阁楼式货架|钢平台 悬臂式货架 贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 辊轮式货架|流利条货架 压入式货架 移动式货架|密集架 模具货架 抽屉式货架 汽车4S店货架 汽配库货架 自动化立体仓库货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|铁板手推车 手推车|静音手推车 置物架|工业置物架|家用置物架 堆垛架|巧固架 挂板架|物料整理架 登高车 物流台车|载物台车 料箱|钢制料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 堆高机|堆垛机|手动堆高机|电动堆高机 叉车|电动叉车|内燃叉车|叉车厂 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|横梁式货架|中型货架 钢托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架> 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|折叠式仓储笼|仓库笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 托盘|塑料托盘|栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|液压搬运车 仓储货架|>仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|托盘搬运车 货架|仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|上海货架|北京货架 轻型货架|中型货架|搁板式货架 重型货架|横梁式货架|托盘式货架 托盘|木托盘|纸托盘|木塑托盘 托盘|钢托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|静音手推车|铁板手推车 物料架|整理架|挂板架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|手动叉车 塑料周转箱|物流箱|塑料化工桶|塑料卡板箱 工具柜|上海工具柜|南京工具柜|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌|南京工作台|上海工作台 刀具车|刀具柜|刀具架|刀具座 货架 货架厂 货架公司 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 上海货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 货架|轻量型货架|角钢货架 货架|中量型货架|次重型货架 货位式货架|横梁式货架|重量型货架 仓储货架|阁楼式货架|钢平台 仓储货架|悬臂式货架 仓储货架|贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 仓库货架|库房货架|抽屉式货架|模具货架 仓库货架|库房货架|汽车4S店货架|汽配库货架 货架厂|货架公司|南京货架|上海货架|无锡货架|苏州货架 货架厂|货架公司|北京货架|天津货架|沈阳货架|大连货架 货架厂|货架公司|广州货架|深圳货架|杭州货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 置物架|多功能置物架|卫浴置物架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|不锈钢托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|电动堆高车|堆垛车 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架