Writing About Bolivia
Over the past few weeks I have received a number of e-mails from people I respect a good deal asking me to use this space to write a critique of two recent pieces of writing about Bolivia.One is a piece on Evo Morales in the current issue of Atlantic, written by a freelancer, Eliza Barclay. The brief article carries the provocative title, “The Mugabe of the Andes?” Barclay, a visitor to Bolivia, argues that Morales is like Mugabe because he is dividing Bolivia along racial lines. Aside from the fact that racial division in Bolivia is hardly a Morales invention, it is a real stretch to compare an African despot who steals elections by violence with a South American President who keeps winning them by historic majorities. The Atlantic editors, who generally produce a good magazine, should have known better.
The more onerous piece of recent writing about Bolivia that deserves notice is a new book by one of the Democratic party’s most well known pollsters, Stanley Greenberg. Mr. Greenberg has been stumping coast to coast for his new book about some of his past clients, Dispatches from the War Room: In the Trenches with Five Extraordinary Leaders. Those leaders and ex-consulting clients include Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Ehud Barak, Nelson Mandela, and Bolivia’s ousted President, Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada. Mr. Greenberg famously helped Sanchez de Lozada win the presidency in 2002, a performance documented up close in Rachel Boynton’s well-done film Our Brand is Crisis.
What is it this month about bad comparisons between Bolivian presidents and their South African counterparts?
This is, to be sure, a remarkable leap of chutzpah for Greenberg. He lifts up a man driven from office by his own people, for acts of violent repression, and casts him in the same league with Mandela, one of the 20th century’s most respected liberators. Mr. Greenberg was paid well, we presume, for his service as a spinner for the former President. So it shouldn’t be all that surprising that he is putting his spin skills to work now to try to paint his former client into a political saint. "A fearless and radical social reformer,” is how Greenberg describes the man whose troops shot children in 2003. Mr. Greenberg’s view contrasts pretty starkly with the families of those killed under Sanchez de Lozada’s command. They, unfortunately, won’t have a podium at Barnes and Noble this month.
But that’s it. That’s all I have to say about these articles. Other people can respond with their respective defenses of Morales or critiques of Sanchez de Lozada. I am not interested in doing either.
Instead, I’d rather use this post to do something more positive, to highlight writing in English about Bolivia that I think is worth reading. I hope readers will add their own suggestions about Spanish language resources.
Books on Bolivia
I begin with books. I have a healthy respect for books on a subject, having written and edited three. It is huge effort to write a book and (with apparent exceptions) there are many points along the way where you are challenged both as to your facts and as to your analysis. My last two books have been ‘peer-reviewed’ by the academic presses that published them. I can say first hand that you don’t go unchallenged, and the writing is the better for it.
So here are a few books on Bolivia worth a look (and apologies for those I left out):
Impasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance: Ben Kohl and Linda Farthing, who co-wrote this book, are both friends of mine. They are also very capable analysts of Bolivia who have lived here off and on for decades and their work shows it.
Llamas, Weavings, and Organic Chocolate: Multicultural Grassroots Development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia: Kevin Healy, the author of this book, is another friend, and a writer with decades of experience in Bolivia. His book has become a classic on development issues.
Whispering in the Giant’s Ear: William Powers wrote this book as a memoir of his time working on sustainable environment issues in the eastern part of the country.
The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia: Some readers of Ben Dangl’s book on recent Bolivian events may dismiss it as being too blindly ‘left’ in its perspective. But Ben takes his research seriously and spends a good deal of time visiting Bolivia to do it.
A Concise History of Bolivia: Herbert Klein’s history text is also considered a classic, written with a great mastery of the nation’s history. But to be honest, its dense writing style takes a subject that is fascinating and makes it a little painful to read.
Rebellion in the Veins: Political Struggle in Bolivia, 1952-82: James Dunkerlee is as solid a Bolivia expert as they come, based at the University of London. His book offers up the kind of sharp history that can only come from someone who has spent years of his life pouring though original sources as few others have.
Unresolved Tensions: Bolivia Past and Present: John Crabtree is a well-respected research associate at Oxford University and his newest work is a seriously done look at recent events.
Dignity and Defiance, Stories from Bolivia’s Challenge to Globalization: I also include our new book here for two reasons. One is that my co-authors and editor would be really ticked if I don’t. Second, I think you should read this first.
[Note: I have used mainly Amazon links above because that’s where these books are available at the lowest price. But independent booksellers also have the book and if you have the extra cash, buy it from them to help keep independent booksellers alive.]
News Coverage
Keeping up with day-to-day events in Bolivia means sifting through press coverage and figuring out what is most worth your time to read. Here are some observations about news coverage of Bolivia:
The Foreign Press
Foreign coverage of Bolivia (in the U.S. in particular) has come a long way since the Water Revolt nine years ago. Back then about 90% of foreign press coverage came out of one long-time A.P. correspondent in La Paz, who had the unfortunate habit of using President Hugo Banzer’s press releases (written by a close friend of his) and turning them into A.P. dispatches. He later lost his job when it was revealed that he was lobbying the Bolivian government on water issues at the same time he was writing about those issues.
Today there are nearly a dozen foreign journalists who count Bolivia as their regular beat. A handful of them actually live in Bolivia. Dan Keane built-up the A.P. bureau in La Paz into a very respectable news operation, and his recent return to the U.S. is journalistic loss. Both the BBC and Reuters have able correspondents here as well, Andres Schipani and Eduardo Garcia. Eduardo, a Spaniard, deserves extra mention. He had the resolve to return to Bolivia after nearly being killed in the same 2007 car crash that took the life of the BBC’s wonderful Lola Almudevar. Jean Friedman-Rudovsky also reports ably from La Paz for Time magazine.
The rest of the foreign journalists live elsewhere in South America, covering Bolivia from where they are and visiting here a few times a year. Simon Romero writes for the New York Times from Caracas, as does Tyler Bridges for the Miami Herald and other McClatchy papers. Joshua Partlow, who came here after a long stint in Iraq, covers Bolivia for the Washington Post out of Rio de Janeiro, as does Julie McCarthy for NPR. Patrick McDonnell covers Bolivia for the Los Angeles Times from Buenos Aires. Most of the other papers and outlets use freelance reporters or the A.P.’s articles.
In my recent trip to the U.S. I heard a few familiar criticisms about coverage from these writers. Most comes from supporters of Evo Morales who believe that the corporate-owned media (all of the above are corporate-owned but for NPR) write with a markedly anti-Morales bias. Romero, of the New York Times, seems to have a regular following of critics on a handful of Blogs.
I have had a good deal of personal interactions with each of these reporters and have watched their writing over the years. I have a solid respect for their work. I may not always agree with their analysis but they are each hard-working reporters who go to great efforts to speak to a variety of sources. Unlike the ‘parachute journalists’ who come in for a week and count themselves as experts, these ongoing reporters have a depth to their work and it shows.
Unfortunately, foreign bureaus are closing fast, including some of those mentioned here. So more and more of the foreign coverage we see is going to be coming from the 'parachuters' who come and go. That's a loss.
The Bolivian Press
While this post is about sources in English, the Bolivian press is still an important source for daily events so I include it here. For those interested in reading Bolivia’s regular dailies, COMTECO, the telecommunications cooperative here, puts together a great shortcut. It produces a daily summary of the top headlines from all the major daily papers in Bolivia, with links to the articles. You can find that here and also subscribe if you like to have the summary sent to your e-mail. Keep in mind however that the daily press in Bolivia is owned by the nation’s wealthy elite and generally reflects their point of view. As a balance to the conservative dailies, you can keep an eye on Red Erbol, which has a great Bolivia news Website. The Bolivian government just launched a daily paper biased towards the government, Cambio, but I don’t know if it is available yet on-line.
Organizations and Independent Sources
There are a number of organizations that produce independent reporting and analysis about Bolivia. Here are a few (with links embedded in their names):
The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) has been putting out good writing on Bolivia for years, as has the Andean Information Network. The Center for Economic and Policy Research produces occasional briefing papers on Bolivia that have good information in them.
And the Blogs
Okay, here’s the deal, I don’t read Blogs. I know that’s funny since I write one, but I don’t. I get an in-box full of articles and links everyday, from both Spanish and English writers. I just don't follow the Blogs. There are lots of Blogs that write about Bolivia, some of them valuable and some of them just silly. In other words, Blogs that cover Bolivia are like Blogs in general, it is up to readers to sift the garbage from the good.
Among the Blogs I do know, two worth looking at are Upside Down World, edited by Ben Dangl, and the material published by Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Luis Gomez at Ukhampacha Bolivia.
And finally, of course, there is this Blog, which we hope you will continue to read regularly, as so many do.
To all our readers, thank you for your kind interest in what we write here. Those of you who have other suggestions of what to read about Bolivia, I hope you will post a description and a link in the comments section below.
Labels: Bolivia-politics

The Democracy Center, based in Cochabamba Bolivia and San Francisco California, works globally to advance human rights through a combination of investigation and reporting, training citizens in the art of public advocacy, and organizing international citizen campaigns. If you like the Blog, consider becoming a subscriber to The Democracy Center's free e-newsletter by sending us an email at 
20 Comments:
The Atlantic piece was well-written and covers all the bases. However, I don't think the title should have been used in that manner when it was attributed to only one person. The big difference between Zimbabwe and Bolivia is that in Bolivia there are no clear distinctions between indigenous and "white."
The majority are shades in between. I haven't seen racial rhetoric like this ever. Sure when the megacoalitions were in power, racism was systematic.
When you have people openly criticizing other members of indigenous communities for not being "indigenous" enough or sell-outs to their people, and as a result, targets for violence, it becomes unfortunate.
In everyday conversations, I am reminded by GWB's famous line "you are either with us or against us." Any critique of the Morales government, then you are automatically part of the "right." Any sympathy for a move by the MAS party and you are a "masista." It's quite frustrating.
I also am disappointed that you have no desire to even read other Bolivian blogs, other than the ones written by foreigners. It is almost as if you automatically discount their viewpoints in favor of those who have a very distinct perspective on Bolivia.
http://www.mabb.blogspot.com/
Jim, when tou write about Evo and Goni you just cant hide your love for Mugabe, sorry Evo, and hate for Goni. Get professional.
Find it a bit suspicious you' won't comment more on Barclay's article, it's well written with some good analysis.
I believe that comparing Morales with Mugabe is entirely appropriate (although Morales is so neuron challenged he'll take it as a compliment).
Let's make the comparisons between both:
- Presiding the most corrupt governments in their respective continents? Check.
- Racist and violent prone demagogues? Check.
- Use foreign imperialists as scapegoats to cover their own acts of violence and gigacorruption? Check.
- Steal land from most productive farmers (i.e. whites) to give to cronies? Check.
- Bully political and racial adversaries personally or by proxy? Check.
- Lust for unlimited power under supposedly "democratic" elections? Check.
- Express outrage against any criticism from press and human rights groups and resorts to insults and threats against them? Check.
- Gigacorrupt governments presiding ruinous economies? Check.
- Failed baby daddys and occassional deadbeat parents? Check.
- Prime grievance mongers and race baiters? Check.
- Avid friends with tinpot dictators and terrorists? Check.
- Megalomaniacs and narcissists? Check.
- Laughingstock of the international community? Check.
- Didn't complete their education? Check.
The list goes on and on, but I think it's convincing enough.
Now, Jim is livid with Greenberg because he likes Goni and, Jim being a Goni hater, can't tolerate it, can't accept it, and, ultimately spews out half truths about his removal of power. He digest the fact of a smiling Goni joining the "gauche caviar" of the American establishment such as Pelosi and Emanuel. Yo, Jim! Goni was ultimately forced from power thanks to the violent actions of Morales' and the Mallku's drunk goons. More Bolivians have been killed under Cuchi Cuchi worshipper than under Goni, so man up and swallow the truth.
Finally, your list of (suprise! lefty references) don't pass the laugher test. A good book to read about Bolivian reality is "Pueblo Enfermo" (Sick People), available in English via Google. It's an oldie one, but very relevant. I like the daily column "Paulovich" as well.
;-)
The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina
Re: the comment above. Yawn
Anonymous 8:10 got it right Jim.
Not that I know these people, but if I were the editor of Upside Down World or Ukhampacha Bolivia I would take the title of "blog" frankly as an insult. They are respectable alternative onlinenews magazines covering stories and perspectives a corporate journalist never would. You are a blog Shultz, please understand the difference.
Maybe Jim reads Spanish as well as Evo speaks Aymara.
Regarding the Atlantic piece, let’s please get serious, set all the ideology aside, and look at it as journalism.
Covered all the bases? How long was the reporter in Bolivia? She couldn’t find a single Morales supporter to quote, to bring some balance into the story, in a country where he has an electoral base of about 2/3?
Then she cites Sabina Cuellar’s opposition to Morales as evidence that major segments of the indigenous population are deserting Morales. But the article includes no mention at all that Cuellar’s candidacy was created by the non-indigenous elite in Chuquiscaca. Did the reporter truly not know that, or was it just inconvenient to her story pitch? This is roughly the equivalent of citing Michael Steele’s election as RNC chair as evidence that blacks in the U.S. are fleeing from Obama.
Morales’ real problems, which are many, are about corruption and mismanagement, not a division among indigenous groups, among whom he wins about 80% of the vote. But that isn’t the kind of story that gets a young ambitious reporter a byline in the Atlantic.
I have been a working freelancer around Latin America and elsewhere for many years and what happened here was obvious. The reporter took a quote that was as silly as saying George W. Bush was Adolph Hitler and peddled into a “new story.” Let’s hope that other young freelancers coming along have better journalistic judgment. Such is the world of foreign reporting with the collapse of news organizations.
You guys crack me up; Jimbo, it was innocent’s day in the USA yesterday? I mean, you cannot really be serious, are you? Not that I care but just because I have time at this moment and you made me laugh I will tell you that your writers represent Bolivian thinking as any writer from Texas visiting, “once in a while New York”, represent New Yorker thinking. Your ignorance is off course simple, you have never visited, befriended and lived the reality of the other 1/3 of Bolivians living in half the territory; the one without so much, but some, quechua-aymara seasoning. In short, your books and blogs are not about Bolivia, are about Bolivian Andean socialism and maSSist misinformation.
Croat, don’t be so crude, you hit the maSSist zealots in this blog right in the gonads; you should try sending a piece to the Atlantic; you know Evo’s deeds better than the gringita reporter; off course she didn’t do it bad at all either.
Ano 9:02 PM, I should remain you that at Evo Morales last electoral victory, he only won the quechua – aymara vote and lost in the districts where the other 34 nations live. Is not a question of number of votes her, but a question of number of indigenous groups. The only thing Morales is doing is giving absolute power to the majority, which doesn’t make 2/3 of the population, in detriment of the rights of the minorities and that is what Mugabe and Hitler did.
Jim, I guess the thing that suprises me is that the locals who spun that poor Atlantic freelancer fed her the Mugabe line. It seems a little early in the game for that. According to the handbook of the out-of-power Latin American elite, you are supposed to start by linking your opponent to someone relatively benign like Lula, then move on to Chavez and Fidel, and only then, having laid the proper groundwork, start bringing up real bad guys such as (this week at least) Mugabe. (I remember when Gaddafi had that part locked up... he was better at it, I think. Mugabe doesn't seem to enjoy the bogeyman role nearly as much.) Probably somebody at the cocktail party forgot their message discipline and leaked a line that wasn't quite ready yet. Either that of the comprador elites are feeling desperate and are starting to throw whatever's handy to see what will stick.
The Atlantic piece shows a rhetorical flair but little else.
Robert Mugabe murdered ethnic and political groups opposed to his power. He is a dictator. He has destroyed the countries industrial and agricultural sectors and sparked famine, corruption, repression and murder in his own country. To compare Evo to Robert Mugabe does not help serve any intellectual discourse, only heighten prejudice and reduce dispassionate discussion.
Morales is not a savvy diplomat, or deft economic chairmen. He has very clear leadership strengths and weaknesses, and Bolivia is benefiting and suffering according to those.
Evo bears responsibility over what happened with Cardenas, for instance. He should act much more strongly to impose the rule of law. Allowing the persecutors of Cardenas to confiscate his land under pretences of the new constitution is unacceptable. To suggest Cardenas staged the incident is grotesque, insulting and deeply, deeply irresponsible.
There are lessons to be learned from Zimbabwe here, certainly. Comparing a flawed leader such as Evo with a corrupt monster such as Mugabe serves nobody, except those who wish to marginalise intelligent debate.
Oh BL, what a silly amusing little boy you continue to be. tisk tisk
"I should remain you that at Evo Morales last electoral victory, he only won the quechua – aymara vote and lost in the districts where the other 34 nations live."
First, I truly do think you should "remain" yourself, really, not someone else.
Second, "where the other 34 nations live." Gee, would that mean that indiginous people in say, your little pueblo of Santa Cruz, are counted as being anti-Evo because they happen to share a department with you?
Never a citation, never a provable fact -- just squeaky little rants and charges as made up as you like.
Oh, but we do believe you dear one, as the children believe the circus clowns. Your act "remains" as always, cute.
And yes, darn those pesky Aymara and Quechua for being so, well, numerous.
Should we expect any mention of MAS' plans to lay seige to congress to prevent the opposition from starting a debate on the new Election Law?
Of course not...being a lefty means you have to be a hypocrit and ignore violations of the most basic human rights by those who you believe are the only defenders. This explains their silence regarding what is going on in Bolivia...and of course Cuba.
...and have you noticed they say nothing at all about what is going on in Belize either. Those leftist dogs!
Boludolibre, Croat and the other Neonazis:
Only you can believe what you write. Evo is so popular because he represents the majority of the country. The rest are like you, a few crying babies who want the goverment back. You stole so much during 500 years, you should just leave and go home. After all Europe needs some of the scum back.
Leave Bolivia free and to be governed by natives, you people have done nothing possitive but conquer, kill, steal, and left nothing good. Let Evo change the corruption inherited and roaming around product of your 500 years of reign. Enough is enough, you croats, sold outs like bolulibre and Goni lovers are despicable, you are enemies of humanity.
I'm sorry, I just HAVE to reply to that multi trillion amalgamation of (wasted) cells that due to some freak of nature came into the sorry form of 12:48. It's just too much fun not to.
Never mind that "it" patently demonstrated "it" was "alphabetized" by the Cubans and has sucked the (metaphorical) teets of the perfect Latin American idiots, but "it" has called "neonazis" to 500 year olds. Sooo...how much time has to go by for the "neo" to disappear for 500 year old youthful folks?
"Enough is enough, you croats, sold outs like bolulibre and Goni lovers are despicable, you are enemies of humanity." Why, I'd never consider you my enemy. No way you could be human!
Just too funny.
;-)
The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina
I think anon 12:48 is a perfect illustration of how morally bankrupt Morales MAS' movement has become. They use the 500yr excuse to justifying theft, rape, and murder. As far as I know, nobody in Bolivia is 500 years old and most of the population was born after 1952, but these trivial facts are often ignored. Just like they ignore the role the Church played against the Dictatorships, just like they ignore the fact that most of the leadership in power are simply re-cycled politicians who benefited from the past corruption.
One would expect a progressive movement to be based on hope, forgiveness, love...but the MAS is not such movement, they are based on fear, revenge and hate. Oh yeah, they are have taken the world famous Lamento Boliviano to new heights to justify their nefarious dealings, but what else can you expect from a people who have never been taught (or for that matter witnesed) good civil conduct? Regardless, readers should be reminded that in Bolivia we have the protestant work ethic taken to the -1 power. That is to say, material success means that you are a theif, poverty is a green light to be a theif. You'll be hard pressed to find a MASISTA who would admit that you can become rich due to hard work or that the cure for poverty is work. The now countless scandals (by now far surpassing anything done in the past 20yrs) point that all the MAS knows how to do is to create havok and steal....
I used to read this comments section, back in the days when people like Norman and Miguel Contreras offered up actual thinking. That was before a tiny group of juvenile name callers took it over. A loss.
But thanks to the Center for this critique and especially for the list of resources. As long as I stop reading just to the end of the posts, the visit remains well worth it.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home